placestats

Owsley County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4021
Density7.9people per km² of land
Median household income$31,064
Land area511km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Owsley County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Allendale County, SC, Claiborne Parish, LA, Holmes County, MS, Humphreys County, MS, Quitman County, MS, Hancock County, GA, Hancock County, TN, Wolfe County, KY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Owsley Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Motor vehicle crash deaths66.60th pct0th pct +3.3 sd
Injury deaths2322nd pct0th pct +3.2 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.2100th pct by value97th pct by value +3.1 sd
Private job growth14.5100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.9 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200478.4100th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.6 sd
Friending bias-0.0313100th pct98th pct -2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.345466-0.3Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain37,030 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%36+1.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over30.6%462+0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.8846·28·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Average test score-0.3539212+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents012·45·-1.4
Business closing rate00·2·-2.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments38———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate834·27·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents0.8942·12·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain42%381+0.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,003———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,003———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening50.7%126-0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people32.134·76·-0.3
Dental visit in the past year48.2%9210+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.856·7·-1.7IRS county migration flows
Economic connectedness0.7049626+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.51952·2·+0.1
Education score-1.3815·3·-0.8
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.70348·38·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,240———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents23.330·59·-0.4
Fine particulate matter7.38356-1.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.23%146-1.4County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population0———Census ACS 5-year
Friending bias-0.031310098-2.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.18180·99·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.507487+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$65,664k———BEA Regional Accounts
Homeownership rate68.3%50·23·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,024———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,35869·94·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,02660·43·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths23220+3.2County Health Rankings
Jail population rate1,61169·97·-0.3
Labour force1,307———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy64.5 years01-2.2County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents3.4138·23·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years67.2%128-1.3CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.9474·2·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$46,404402-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$40,19072·7·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$39,16364·6·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain33.2 min167+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.9 years92·89·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$79,90022·2·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$31,064—2—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$35,000160-1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill56249·7·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0248%342-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0165-1.6County Health Rankings
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain66.600+3.3County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share170·97·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate896·98·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.0396·77·+1.8IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units1,506———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents014·11·-0.9
Owner-occupied housing units1,028———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,840———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return294·96·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,519———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$21,285464-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,3488831+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$196,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,984———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,001———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,393———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,084———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,972———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over848———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line960———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,294———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,862———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,909———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,430———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain339———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,051———
Poverty rate24.9%928-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)33.1%221+0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality1,07421+2.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,826———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,999———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,686———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,580———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,759———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,895———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,839———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays5,829102+1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate74724·64·-0.6
Private job growth14.5100·99·+2.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs450———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0104268-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents27.610·8·-1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.2100·97·+3.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200478.4100·92·+2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877100·92·+2.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.9100·93·+2.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201685.298·92·+1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202088.598·97·+2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.998·97·+1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.6856·43·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%6·5·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit31.3%34·96·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains2.99%2·0·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%8·9·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Share aged 65 and over21.1%76·64·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%0·5·-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain16.5%92·97·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%0·1·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.3%20·21·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.2%2·11·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married49.6%92·33·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.3%90·88·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain11.7%88·99·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain11.4%343-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.5%829-0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.4930·1·-0.7
Tax returns filed1,340———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken4,823———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population4,021———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0355155-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed67———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.1%4010-0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain25.6%68·83·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain518———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 50759———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,117———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost23,92021+2.2County Health Rankings

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.