placestats

Wolfe County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6484
Density11.3people per km² of land
Median household income$29,052
Land area575km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wolfe County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: McDowell County, WV, Holmes County, MS, Lake County, TN, Owsley County, KY, East Carroll Parish, LA, Hancock County, TN, Allendale County, SC, Claiborne Parish, LA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wolfe Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Business opening rate15.898th pct by value98th pct by value +2.5 sd
Per capita income$15,2530th pct2nd pct -2.5 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.40598th pct90th pct -2.4 sd
Net business formation rate10.5100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.2 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over41.1%2nd pct0th pct +2.1 sd
Share now married53%98th pct by value54th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3817823+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work42,050 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over41.1%20+2.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.2218·15·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Average test score uncertain-0.07569648+2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents012·45·-1.3
Business closing rate5.2614·5·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments80———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate15.898·98·+2.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents0.7237·11·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain39.5%572-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,407———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,407———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening50.1%65-1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people2931·69·-0.6
Dental visit in the past year40%393+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.8735·55·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Drug overdose deaths uncertain99.9—1—County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.6688620+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.6537·1·-0.3
Education score0.13396·52·+1.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.58940·25·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,398———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents26.541·65·-0.3
Fine particulate matter7.38156-1.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.24%167-1.1County Health Rankings
Friending bias0.01128686-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14525·93·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4059890-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$147,020k———BEA Regional Accounts
High school graduation0.925%9775+1.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate69.9%58·29·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing units3,043———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,48777·95·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$10,08394·79·+1.7IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths18382+1.5County Health Rankings
Jail population rate1,61166·96·-0.3
Labour force1,523———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy65.5 years61-1.7County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.216—51·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$618k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents4.2157·30·-0.1
Mammography in the past two years68.2%1813-1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.4290·4·+1.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$48,612593+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,53486·14·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$33,45116·1·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work31.2 min2812+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.5 years54·50·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5076·2·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$66,4006·1·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$29,052—2—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$40,949692+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill39117·2·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0571%8627+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0165-1.6County Health Rankings
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain41283+0.4County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99945·93·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate10.5100·99·+2.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.6522·5·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units2,545———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0225·17·-0.9
Owner-occupied housing units1,778———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,810———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·90·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,292———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$15,25302-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$46,9278622+0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$298,920k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,370———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,282———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,225———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,858———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,504———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,262———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,404———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,753———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,311———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,129———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,119———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain333———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,562———
Poverty rate38.1%02+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)28.6%712-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality99961+1.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,425———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,155———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,968———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,559———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,635———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,979———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,915———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays5,662132+1.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate87646·73·-0.3
Private job growth-5.48·4·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,068———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01224715-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents31.420·14·-1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200052.778·29·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200444.357·9·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200848.563·25·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201261.280·48·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201670.680·51·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202071.478·55·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202475.878·63·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202423.184·90·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%6·5·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit28.6%12·93·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains5.98%47·3·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.99%94·74·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Safety score-3.6614·1·-1.3
Share aged 65 and over19.5%56·48·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.4%78·85·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.4%96·98·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.3%4·11·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53%98·54·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic96.1%96·99·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain10.4%76·96·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain7.39%40-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours45.4%372+0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.3441·2·-0.3
Tax returns filed2,340———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,754———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population6,484———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01764621-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed125———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate8.2%41+1.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain16.4%8·56·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain498———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 501,258———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,349———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost22,19381+1.6County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.