placestats

Allendale County, SC

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7738
Density7.3people per km² of land
Median household income$31,603
Land area1057km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Allendale County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Claiborne Parish, LA, Owsley County, KY, Humphreys County, MS, Quitman County, MS, Hancock County, GA, Holmes County, MS, Greene County, AL, Hancock County, TN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Allendale Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents10.396th pct by value72nd pct by value +2.3 sd
Learning rate0.034493rd pct86th pct +2.1 sd
People per tax return22nd pct by value13th pct by value -2.0 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.1%100th pct32nd pct -2.0 sd
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-11,0172nd pct by value6th pct by value -1.9 sd
Mean travel time to work37.7 min2nd pct1st pct +1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.31442-1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance18.2%227+0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work92,570 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.267%5559-0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.1%10032-2.0CDC PLACES
Any disability39.1%9311-1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.0588·70·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.2%7816-0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score-1.0520-1.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13.7%4795+0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents18.290·99·+1.3
Black-white residential segregation21.126·5·-0.7County Health Rankings
Business closing rate5.0814·4·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments121———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.274·64·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.3%6798-0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.0952·14·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain44.6%281+0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.442%24·95·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,541———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,541———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.7%6046+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.8%9113-0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.3%9817-1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.8%9861+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people39.868·87·+0.5
Coronary heart disease7%9810-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%7334-0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.8%9315-0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year47.9%9210+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.2780·83·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression20.4%6487-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes17.9%532-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.4793·6·+1.2
Economic connectedness0.36140-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.51452·2·+0.1
Education score-0.58556·15·+0.3
Effective property tax rate0.8870·54·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,422———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents26.848·66·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health29.7%804-0.9CDC PLACES
Firearm fatalities uncertain38.7362+0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.28%2411-0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity36.2%411+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.7%8028-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16.4%8010-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.09013329+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.18178·99·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.529263+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$388,890k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.83989·9·+1.0
Hearing disability6.2%10078-1.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure44.8%642-0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33%9637-1.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate64.7%44·15·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Homicide rate uncertain32292+0.3County Health Rankings
Housing insecurity27%461+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units4,055———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0217163-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate94316·44·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-11,0172·6·-1.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.9%804-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1332911+0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate00·0·-0.5
Jail population rate43433·53·-0.5
Labour force2,541———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation16.9%692-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support33.9%411+0.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.03449386+2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy69.5 years485+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness38.9%726-0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.396·72·+2.3
Mammography in the past two years75.9%9071+1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-2.4542·1·-0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$46,729462-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$29,4018·0·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$40,41868·9·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work37.7 min21+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.5 years72·60·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$69167·15·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$61,6006·0·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$31,603—3—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$35,477220-0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill54249·6·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0202%181-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations5.283611-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability20.2%823-0.9CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.67552·21·+0.2
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain40.4414+0.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99836·87·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.0886·94·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.21578·31·+0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity36.6%805-1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity46.9%472-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,163———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.7236·27·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units2,045———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,380———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return22·13·-2.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,652———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$23,057666+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$45,1007016+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$342,580k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,596———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,369———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,542———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,040———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,588———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,680———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,824———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,131———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,889———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,537———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,817———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain745———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,039———
Poverty rate uncertain26.5%746-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)32.6%281+0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality740686-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,340———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,591———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,024———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,163———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,592———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,593———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,023———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%5·2·-1.6
Preventable hospital stays2,1439074-1.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate58521·49·-0.9
Private job growth2.9472·68·+0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,542———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01325621-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps26.9%26·97·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents57.270·71·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200029.318·1·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200427.710·1·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200823.812·2·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201220.312·1·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201622.410·1·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202023.510·1·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202427.310·2·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-1.9620·16·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.65%26·14·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit34.7%52·98·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains4.95%26·2·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.32%26·34·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year80%44·96·+0.2CDC PLACES
Safety score-2.6141·2·-0.1
Self-care disability6.9%642-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.7%82·69·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic64%59·99·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain10.7%36·31·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.1%46·50·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married41.9%56·94·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married38.6%50·5·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain90.8%75·97·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain5.53%93·100·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic22.6%26·3·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.88%50·86·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain13.3%588+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours46.1%321+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.5722·1·-0.8
Stroke5.2%401-0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication67%64·99·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,030———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,831———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off19.5%622-0.2CDC PLACES
Total population7,738———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01827781+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed119———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.7%5815-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22%48·76·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units892———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability9.3%623-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,398———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,453———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost16,836475-0.1County Health Rankings

17of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.