placestats

Holt County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4254
Density3.5people per km² of land
Median household income$58,516
Land area1198km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Holt County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Essex County, VT, Elmore County, ID, Refugio County, TX, Blaine County, OK, Atchison County, MO, Alger County, MI, Aitkin County, MN, Mitchell County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Holt Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people59.296th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd
Social connection score1.2894th pct by value97th pct by value +1.8 sd
Membership organisations23.594th pct97th pct +1.6 sd
Preventable hospital stays4,2376th pct8th pct +1.6 sd
Poverty rate9.79%94th pct78th pct -1.5 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.035794th pct95th pct +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5088888+1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.4%6262-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work38,270 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over20.3%2823+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability36%3625+0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.524·6·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26%3029+0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1448476+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.2%4039-0.1CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain61.4—63·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.2
Business closing rate7.2632·24·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments128———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate13.790·94·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%211+0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.548·18·-1.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.8%8666-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.213%50·42·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort821———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income821———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81%3219-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.8%2628+0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.1%2019+0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58%8254+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people59.296·98·+2.1
Coronary heart disease6%5042-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%4847-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.7%2622+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.5%4030-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.5820·19·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression26%3228+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.3%5857-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.32150·33·-0.2
Economic connectedness1.018885+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.98582·60·+1.0
Effective property tax rate0.77335·45·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,887———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents40.582·84·+1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health20.3%6046-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.72046+0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%5227+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.2%6062-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain54———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.4%3233+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.2%5440-0.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.007359293-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12548·72·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4553640+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$265,300k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.23250·36·-0.0
Hearing disability7.9%2815+0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.8%5649-0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.6%3242+0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.4%68·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.5%6054-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units2,420———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate79526·33·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-7,76014·10·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.5%4434+0.1CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,82833·43·-0.5
Jail population rate27828·27·-0.7
Labour force1,947———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.7%6050-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.1%9794-1.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy78.2 years9081+1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.9%6877-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents14.968·85·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years74.6%8060+0.9CDC PLACES
Material security score0.41176·59·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$69,3467853+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,38914·16·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$52,14970·49·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.3 min4871+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.8 years74·88·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$70239·16·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$122,30040·23·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,516—36—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,2608446+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill94520·23·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0593%1031-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations23.59497+1.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.1%4839-0.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99766·78·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate6.4592·97·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.0514·11·-1.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.4%3425+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity37%6460-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,722———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents018·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units1,350———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,950———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return246·51·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,605———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,9336856+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$65,9488879+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$281,330k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,266———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,248———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,555———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,342———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,105———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,098———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line405———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line508———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,135———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,164———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,959———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher636———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,223———
Poverty rate9.79%9478-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.2%7061-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3978072-0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,662———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,691———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,633———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,310———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,355———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,343———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,352———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population71.4%69·60·+0.5
Preventable hospital stays4,23768+1.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate51646·40·-0.3
Private job growth4.1886·80·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs997———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03579495+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.4%32·39·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents56.966·70·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200066.658·75·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200469.762·75·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200869.162·78·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201275.878·84·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.790·91·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202085.494·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.786·89·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202418.182·81·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.93%36·21·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.5%52·51·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16.9%54·59·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.93%58·54·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.4%74·51·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%6648-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.8%76·89·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.353%—17·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.3%70·72·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.27%13·11·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.67%15·6·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.1%88·95·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%91·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.2%16·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.3%58·69·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%90·53·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.77%20·34·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.2%92·93·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.2%88·95·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.5%5444-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.5%1831+0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.2894·97·+1.8
Stroke3.2%5842-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58%36·44·+0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,070———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,179———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.2%5445-0.1CDC PLACES
Total population4,254———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed60———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.1%4464-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate28.8%68·88·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units698———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%6652-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50766———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain47———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,798———Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.