placestats

Perquimans County, NC

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,146
Density20.5people per km² of land
Median household income$61,224
Land area640km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Perquimans County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Gilchrist County, FL, Preston County, WV, Randolph County, IN, Lincoln County, OR, Washington County, IN, Lamar County, TX, Perry County, IN, Henry County, KY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Perquimans Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share widowed11.3%100th pct by value98th pct by value +4.8 sd
Black Protestant adherents13100th pct by value97th pct by value +4.6 sd
Children in single-parent households0.385%100th pct by value91st pct by value +3.0 sd
Share aged 65 and over28.4%96th pct by value95th pct by value +2.7 sd
Income gap between arrivals and departures$17,63998th pct by value91st pct by value +2.5 sd
Share divorced7.89%0th pct by value5th pct by value -2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3831624-0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.8%3846-0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work164,460 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16.5%5642-0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability32.4%6246-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.0696·89·+1.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25%6242-0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1163640-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.4%7668-0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents13100·97·+4.6
Black-white residential segregation26.511·9·-1.3County Health Rankings
Business closing rate10.388·83·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments165———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.372·66·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%8469-1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents04·6·-1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain24.8%1021+1.3Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.385%100·91·+3.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,708———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,708———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.3%9386+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7%8443-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.8%6244-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening62.3%9887+1.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people29.274·70·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5.9%7847-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.4%4219+0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.9%8752-1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.6%9075+1.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.4686·70·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression26.2%4226+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.7%6950-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.02462·47·+0.4
Drug overdose deaths uncertain57.5810+2.1County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.6731821-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6562022-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.81892·50·+1.2
Education score0.025550·45·+0.0
Effective property tax rate0.62222·29·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,433———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.644·50·-0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health19.4%7854-0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.89486-1.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.48%8074+0.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.9%2941+0.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain299———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.8%8245-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.9%9364-1.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04567265-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12362·67·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4128686-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$393,990k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.14684·62·+1.3
Hearing disability6.8%6953-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.9%4933+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.5%7159-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%8375+0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate72.7%30·42·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.8%2940+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units6,918———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate91819·42·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$17,63998·91·+2.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9%6244-0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1172024+0.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,48818·29·-0.7
Jail population rate56848·67·-0.0
Labour force5,634———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.3%2440+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24%5647-0.2CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.05041212-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.7 years3634-0.3County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.2%4446-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents9.5866·69·+0.3
Mammography in the past two years77.9%9486+1.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.22354·49·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$69,4668853+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$71,83296·81·+2.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$54,19380·56·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work35.4 min24+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age50.5 years98·94·+2.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,06196·78·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$211,60092·65·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,224—44—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,1576845+0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,31646·39·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0506%1220-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.842442-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.4%6447-0.5CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain17.17655-0.7County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.9888·29·-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate030·35·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.698·96·+2.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.6%8265-0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity37.5%7156-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,580———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents1.2748·38·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units4,058———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return11,670———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return246·43·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,988———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,6267650+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,3019257+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$752,580k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,367———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,377———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,140———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over10,937———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,762———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,732———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,494———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,000———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,119———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,245———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,356———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,992———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,005———
Poverty rate11.4%9466-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.1%3638+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5275039+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,306———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,958———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,501———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,652———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,708———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,484———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,666———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population81.6%87·77·+1.1
Preventable hospital stays2,3047668-0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate3496·20·-1.2
Private job growth2.6466·64·+0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,747———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02148669+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps14.2%41·59·+0.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents43.552·40·-0.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200052.318·28·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.134·46·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20085736·47·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201258.126·40·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201664.318·37·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202066.320·43·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202469.926·47·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202417.672·80·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.68%90·72·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.4%58·61·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains15.8%80·53·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.485%0·9·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.2%96·85·+1.1CDC PLACES
Safety score-1.0110·17·-1.5
Self-care disability3.9%3640-0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over28.4%96·95·+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic21.8%90·82·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced7.89%0·5·-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.27%63·30·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.97%40·26·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.4%20·30·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.5%46·40·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.3%76·63·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.67%96·84·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic69.8%16·34·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed11.3%100·98·+4.8Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.4%6843+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.2%8276-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.22424·35·-0.7
Stroke3.4%2730+0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.3%60·67·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,190———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken17,207———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.3%4143-0.2CDC PLACES
Total population13,146———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed201———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%5443-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate19.3%82·68·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,338———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.3%3841+0.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,377———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,641———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost13,273619+1.4County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.