placestats

Parmer County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9752
Density4.3people per km² of land
Median household income$68,164
Land area2281km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Parmer County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Scotland County, MO, Lincoln County, MN, Taylor County, IA, Dixon County, NE, Box Butte County, NE, Bayfield County, WI, Cassia County, ID, Coffey County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Parmer Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Cancer other than skin cancer5.4%100th pct97th pct -3.8 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance29.5%2nd pct1st pct +3.5 sd
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race66.1%100th pct by value96th pct by value +3.4 sd
Share White, not Hispanic31%0th pct by value5th pct by value -3.1 sd
Share foreign-born23.6%97th pct by value97th pct by value +3.0 sd
Dental visit in the past year47.5%0th pct9th pct -2.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4461468-1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance29.5%21+3.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work81,550 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.357%5727-0.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.9%2446+0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability34.8%2032+1.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.7742·26·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.6%9294-1.5CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2291224-1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.6%7849-0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate8.7948·56·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments197———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.486·88·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.4%10097-3.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.746·62·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.3%2453+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.258%83·62·+1.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,427———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,427———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%8043+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%7877-0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.2%2538+0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening48.9%23-1.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.452·65·-0.2
Coronary heart disease5.9%2947+0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.1%10097-1.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.7%8879-1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year47.5%09-2.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0578·60·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression20.5%8886-1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.5%214+2.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.42416·30·-1.4
Economic connectedness0.614413-2.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9195869+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.95142·58·-0.3
Education score0.53276·77·+0.9
Effective property tax rate1.5796·90·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,695———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents38.788·83·+1.6
Fair or poor self-rated health26.5%612+2.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.97784-0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%2615-0.8County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population2,302———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.3%6574-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.9%828+1.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.07752839+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10918·38·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3879697-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,404,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.19614·39·-1.0
Hearing disability7%4344-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.3%2254+0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.1%1035+1.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.932%7780+0.9County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate68.4%6·24·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing units3,753———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0233—54—Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,09978·56·+0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-6,75614·12·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9%2044+0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain92.95556-0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,77050·41·-0.2
Jail population rate43364·53·+0.1
Labour force4,829———BLS LAUS
Learning rate uncertain0.0378588+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.7 years3055-0.5County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents7.1428·56·-0.8
Mammography in the past two years72.4%5039-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.79578·82·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$63,716835-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,3026·11·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,05932·37·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work17.8 min7888-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age36.2 years16·12·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,01594·74·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$127,30020·26·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$68,164—63—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$62,9132450-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,99470·67·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0234%02-1.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.53264-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.5%825+1.7CDC PLACES
Mobility score0.253—72·—
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain26.54121+0.3County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99442·56·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.6292·87·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.2814·8·-1.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity33.2%613+2.0CDC PLACES
Obesity37.4%6557-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,183———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents1.0150·32·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,178———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,400———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·97·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,340———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,776429-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$78,1359891+1.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$757,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,691———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,617———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,474———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,935———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,170———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,463———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain931———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,278———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,659———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,537———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,736———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,030———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,869———
Poverty rate uncertain9.64%7079-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.4%2051+0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4214665-0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,744———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,773———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,713———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,554———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,466———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,650———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,504———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population43.8%40·24·-0.4
Preventable hospital stays2,6293255+0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate71584·61·+0.8
Private job growth2.4660·62·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs5,614———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01862456-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents58.562·73·+0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200083.696·98·+1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200485.996·99·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200880.586·96·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201279.286·90·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201679.872·79·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.484·83·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248688·92·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242.416·27·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.31%64·52·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit19.3%98·70·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.41%6·16·-2.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.763%8·13·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.9%22·14·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.5%623+1.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over15%14·13·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%27·14·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain8.09%4·6·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born23.6%97·97·+3.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race66.1%100·96·+3.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.6%60·69·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.9%68·42·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.3%92·94·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.36%30·21·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.98%—90·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic31%0·5·-3.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.68%4·3·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher16.7%1623-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.3%842+1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.20912·36·-1.4
Stroke3.2%1842+0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.7%25·26·-0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,930———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,224———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population9,752———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed134———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%5876-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain15.2%54·51·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain570———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.4%611+2.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,924———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,575———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,3975170-0.2County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.