placestats

Dixon County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5561
Density4.5people per km² of land
Median household income$69,156
Land area1232km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Dixon County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bayfield County, WI, Parmer County, TX, Klickitat County, WA, Marshall County, KS, Box Butte County, NE, Sheridan County, WY, Scotland County, MO, Lincoln County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Dixon Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Depression17.1%100th pct98th pct -2.5 sd
Education score1.23100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.3 sd
Obesity43.6%0th pct7th pct +2.2 sd
Frequent mental distress15.2%92nd pct95th pct -2.1 sd
Trend in average test score0.0433100th pct98th pct +2.1 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents43.896th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.558695+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12.7%2229+0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work57,130 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16.8%2040+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability27.7%7680-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.2730·16·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.2%8490-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1116471+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.4%3417+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents090·45·-0.3
Business closing rate11.386·91·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments98———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.382·87·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%6253+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1450·69·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain9.9%9490-1.3Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.204%69·38·+0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,004———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,004———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.1%1411-0.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%4865-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.8%8683-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening50.6%86-1.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people4190·89·+1.4
Coronary heart disease5.8%3252+0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.2%9496-1.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16%3451+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.8%4255-0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1552·33·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression17.1%10098-2.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.1%4261-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.46754·67·+0.4
Economic connectedness0.9896282+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9296070+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.1660·69·+0.3
Education score1.23100·98·+2.3
Effective property tax rate1.2172·76·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,131———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents11.430·27·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health17.7%5070-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.65172-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.45%7263+0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.2%2654+0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population435———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.2%9295-2.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.2%6478-0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.05023660-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11222·45·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.475622+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$493,160k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.39274·77·+0.7
Hearing disability7.3%2631+0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.8%6878-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.4%8893-1.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate77.3%44·67·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.6%3466+0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units2,528———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate36221·5·-1.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-4,14020·20·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.7%6272-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain75.17681-1.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate77710·9·-1.0
Jail population rate21135·17·-0.5
Labour force3,191———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.9%4565-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22%5870-0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.03026883+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy78.9 years8486+1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.5%6381-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents43.896·99·+2.0
Mammography in the past two years76.2%7474+0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.63448·73·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$72,2494460-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$53,13950·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$57,27972·64·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.6 min3062+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.1 years50·56·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$66110·11·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$141,40036·33·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$69,156—66—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,5215063+0.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,71460·57·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0652%3639-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.55886+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12%4666-0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99226·41·-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.0358·53·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.87624·14·-0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.2%2232+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity43.6%07+2.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,237———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents026·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,729———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,160———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return260·73·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,796———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,2147676+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$63,1906074+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$349,440k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,530———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,491———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,427———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,099———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,731———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,179———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain387———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain451———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,469———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,369———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,127———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher886———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,606———
Poverty rate uncertain7.08%9694-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain8.4%9691-1.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3478883-1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,792———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,009———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,794———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,686———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,782———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,083———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,895———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.5
Preventable hospital stays2,5774057+0.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1519·2·-1.2
Private job growth4.2182·80·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,484———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01371423-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.8%63·35·+0.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents69.272·87·+0.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.162·81·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200468.452·72·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200865.450·69·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.748·62·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.662·75·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202078.260·74·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202479.964·74·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.754·56·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.3%18·30·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.1%30·21·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.6%34·63·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.766%10·13·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.9%46·21·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%3457-0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.2%50·65·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.1%48·38·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born7.82%77·78·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race15.1%77·78·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.2%92·92·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%34·17·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59%72·88·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.4%5·4·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic82%34·52·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.46%40·40·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23.7%7059+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.8%7485-0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.62256·85·+0.2
Stroke3%3258-0.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59%92·62·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,610———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,466———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.7%3767-0.0CDC PLACES
Total population5,561———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.043310098+2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed60———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.9%9697-1.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain11.5%28·34·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain291———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%3454-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,060———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,531———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,81210094-1.6County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.