placestats

Coffey County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8304
Density5.1people per km² of land
Median household income$67,377
Land area1624km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Coffey County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Adair County, IA, Craig County, VA, Taylor County, IA, Callahan County, TX, Renville County, MN, Parmer County, TX, Kossuth County, IA, Dixon County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Coffey Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Economic connectedness in high school1.12100th pct90th pct +2.4 sd
Prison population rate82989th pct by value71st pct by value +1.6 sd
Jail admission rate3704th pct by value3rd pct by value -1.5 sd
Received food stamps7.6%5th pct by value10th pct by value -1.3 sd
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1710.8%88th pct86th pct -1.3 sd
Friending bias-0.0012290th pct91st pct -1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4946085+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.2%5965-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work78,045 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.6%2648+0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability30.9%4357+0.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.3460·38·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.4%2049+0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1185972+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.6%6333-0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.3340·46·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments190———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.2516·9·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3132+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.2822·38·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.8%8886-1.3Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.229%69·51·+0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort923———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income923———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%6131+0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%3152+0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.1%3553+0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55%3628-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people32.380·76·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5.7%5157-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%4360-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%3141+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year55.9%1835-1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.9238·27·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression22.4%6165-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.7%6770-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.33647·61·+0.2
Economic connectedness1.017685+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.1210090+2.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0962·65·+0.4
Education score0.54982·78·+0.9
Effective property tax rate1.1664·73·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,705———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents21.672·55·+0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health17.3%7173-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.51424+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%5244+0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.7%7977-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain102———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.1%4359+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.5%5972-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.001229091-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11848·58·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4039091-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$995,580k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.21357·67·+0.3
Hearing disability7.1%3739-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.5%3761+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.9%3367+0.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.903%6357+0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate75.9%50·59·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.3%5870-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units3,985———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,16484·60·+1.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$8,83974·76·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.1%5564-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1191422+1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3704·3·-1.5
Jail population rate33553·38·-0.1
Labour force3,837———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.2%8479-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.5%7178-0.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.6 years4665+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31%7688-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents18.468·90·+0.3
Mammography in the past two years67.4%149-1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.89296·87·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$75,1667066+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$64,09078·72·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$55,25162·59·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.9 min4067+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age44 years70·72·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$84254·49·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$139,50028·32·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$67,377—61—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,9337664+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,61846·54·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0977%7678+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.13661-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.3%4961-0.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99778·78·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.0818·11·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.41272·60·+0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.4%5559-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity36.9%6961-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,547———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents090·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents2.9460·70·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units2,692———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,660———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return260·66·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,804———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,2757468+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$58,0145063-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$479,890k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,272———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,251———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,889———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,507———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,924———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,826———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line782———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line796———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,183———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,122———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,052———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,257———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,360———
Poverty rate9.56%8080-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.8%8281-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4423660+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,040———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,408———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,232———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,906———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,068———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,565———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,377———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population70.6%54·59·+0.2
Preventable hospital stays1,3518894-1.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate82989·71·+1.6
Private job growth-1.5310·13·-1.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,318———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02485480+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.6%5·10·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents48.242·52·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.370·81·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.976·87·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200873.280·86·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.482·86·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.880·82·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202078.466·74·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.362·70·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024942·48·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.06%44·47·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.2%40·29·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.2%60·79·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.28%26·32·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.6%76·41·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%6167-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22%56·71·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0.951%76·53·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13%82·68·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.23%10·10·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.36%28·31·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.9%18·19·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%86·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.3%20·11·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.3%66·81·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.75%50·33·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.29%67·28·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.2%82·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.34%71·59·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.2%4648-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%3464+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.68164·87·+0.4
Stroke2.9%6567-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%94·70·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,920———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,771———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.4%3457+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population8,304———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01417273+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed132———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%3251+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate11%26·32·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units438———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.2%8276-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,690———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,563———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,5667279-0.5County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.