placestats

Mackinac County, MI

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population10,865
Density4.1people per km² of land
Median household income$58,598
Land area2647km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Mackinac County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Price County, WI, Gila County, AZ, Texas County, OK, Elmore County, ID, Klamath County, OR, Atchison County, MO, Alger County, MI, Holt County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Mackinac Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Unemployment rate9.1%0th pct1st pct +4.7 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation9.12%100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.7 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0446100th pct98th pct +2.8 sd
People per tax return20th pct by value1st pct by value -2.5 sd
Vacancy rate51.5%98th pct by value99th pct by value +2.4 sd
High school graduation0.719%4th pct2nd pct -2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4242053-0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.1%9282-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work87,400 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.267%7359-0.5County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.8%9688-1.6CDC PLACES
Any disability34.5%4233+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.8884·67·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.2%616+1.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.06315650-0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.5%7451-0.6CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain56.229·50·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.2
Black-white residential segregation85.9—99·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate7.9536·37·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments333———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed26———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened38———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.676·81·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1219+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.246·60·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.2%4643-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.253%73·61·+0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,452———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,452———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.9%9869+1.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.4%618+1.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.4%4636+0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.5%9883+1.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.748·66·-0.2
Coronary heart disease6.5%1222+0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.4%104+1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.6%1823+0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.6%9888+1.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.9986·79·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression28.5%69+1.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.5%2436+0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.33340·33·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.8344256-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6991929-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.5846·36·-0.2
Education score-0.5814·15·-1.1
Effective property tax rate1.0447·65·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,857———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents20.862·53·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health21.5%3038+0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.78488-0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.27%1810-1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity20.3%1624+0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain586———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.5%416+1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.2%1423+0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02986876-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12862·76·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4463849+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$649,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.11654·44·+0.1
Hearing disability7.6%3821-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.1%3646+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.6%5671-0.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.719%42-2.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate77.4%62·67·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.5%1326+0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units10,575———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate53214·14·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-7,81610·10·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.1%1626+0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths92.15758-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,54027·31·-0.6
Jail population rate28135·28·-0.5
Labour force5,341———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation11.1%1321+0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.4%2131+0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.04737793+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.2 years7673+0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.1%1847+0.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents9.0856·67·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years72.7%5842+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.097629·32·-0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,4652626-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$54,53458·49·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$62,35092·75·+1.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.6 min3862+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age53.3 years96·97·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$76149·29·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$165,60072·47·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,598—36—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$51,353417-1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,71952·57·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.152%9696+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.47088+0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.3%3637+0.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99318·47·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.6784·88·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.10248·36·-0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.4%7050-0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity41.3%2419+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,128———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.6548·25·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units3,970———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,200———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return20·1·-2.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,790———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,8626856+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,0836859+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$624,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,942———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,851———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,545———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,233———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,566———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,156———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,804———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,466———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,681———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,779———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,245———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,010———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,834———
Poverty rate16.9%2230+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.6%5249-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3828675-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,970———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,599———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,396———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,099———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,097———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,015———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,238———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population22.2%7·8·-1.5
Preventable hospital stays1,3978494-1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate37520·23·-0.7
Private job growth2.9361·68·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,823———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.044610098+2.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps19.3%92·83·+1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents41.734·36·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.428·42·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200456.830·36·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200851.928·33·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201256.230·35·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201664.228·37·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202062.118·34·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202462.614·32·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.2324·38·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.56%48·36·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.2%16·28·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16.8%42·58·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation9.12%100·99·+3.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.7%96·80·+1.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%2634+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over29%94·96·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic14.1%89·94·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.966%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic4.1%69·50·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.7%62·65·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain5.39%72·65·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.06%26·13·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.1%24·20·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married27.3%62·44·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.5%50·58·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain69.5%—91·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic6.66%93·94·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain0.524%0·2·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic71.8%28·37·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.47%12·40·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23.5%7658+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.2%6869-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.67572·87·+0.6
Stroke3.5%1025+0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.4%52·52·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,250———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,446———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.8%821+1.3CDC PLACES
Total population10,865———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed484———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate9.1%01+4.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate51.5%98·99·+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units5,447———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.7%2832+0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,867———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain105———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,869———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,3658881-0.8County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.