placestats

McHenry County, ND

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5264
Density1.1people per km² of land
Median household income$80,614
Land area4854km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like McHenry County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Steele County, ND, Skagway Municipality, AK, Converse County, WY, Elko County, NV, Bowman County, ND, Hartley County, TX, Oliver County, ND, Rich County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where McHenry Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Obesity41.7%2nd pct16th pct +1.8 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents42.792nd pct by value99th pct by value +1.7 sd
Business opening rate4.032nd pct by value3rd pct by value -1.6 sd
Poverty rate (model-based)12.3%6th pct60th pct +1.5 sd
Mean travel time to work28.8 min8th pct21st pct +1.5 sd
Mammography in the past two years79.2%98th pct93rd pct +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5838298+0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.1%7282-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work61,145 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.444%3612+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.3%2050+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability28.5%4274-0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.996·3·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.8%1258+1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.07082864-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.6%164+1.1CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain107—97·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate7.2620·24·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments122———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate4.032·3·-1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%5232+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents16.166·74·+0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.8%1666+0.9Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.0867%4·1·-1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort834———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income834———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%3820-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.9%3073+0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.7%6485-0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.7%6451+0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people4378·90·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5.6%2063+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%4269-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.5%2658+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64%5077+0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.1314·10·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression21.4%5878-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.9%5086-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.62448·75·+0.1
Economic connectedness1.189198+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.095088+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4236·80·-0.2
Education score0.29554·62·+0.0
Effective property tax rate0.66340·34·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,609———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.4232·11·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health16.6%4080-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.45692-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%9071+1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.5%6389-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain86———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.5%8093-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%5082-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02718997-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11749·55·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4284670+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$341,890k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.26644·70·-0.0
Hearing disability7.3%2031+0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.1%1065+1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.7%4480-0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.3%62·83·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.8%5989-0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units2,832———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,38584·71·+0.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$26,14892·96·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.4%4079-0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1122428+0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,45975·60·+0.3
Jail population rate1,10594·92·+0.3
Labour force2,698———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.8%5988-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.5%5678-0.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.02564679+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy76.1 years2360-0.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.5%5691-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents42.792·99·+1.7
Mammography in the past two years79.2%9893+1.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.74641·79·-0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$80,0403674-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$78,35383·87·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$52,20522·49·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.8 min821+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years62·67·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$73714·24·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$143,20022·34·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$80,614—85—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,9732266-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill9494·23·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.164%9298+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations15.46082+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11%4481-0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99220·39·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-3.2310·7·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.1428·10·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.2%2868+0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity41.7%216+1.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,265———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0638·20·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,819———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,110———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return254·62·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,581———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$41,0875282-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$72,0585686-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$371,240k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,152———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,131———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,234———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,898———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,720———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,148———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line511———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line624———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,199———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,073———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,738———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher777———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,345———
Poverty rate9.83%3878+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.3%660+1.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4372061+0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,737———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,820———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,416———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,712———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,820———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,003———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,752———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population99%88·94·+1.2
Preventable hospital stays3,1091734+0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate28024·13·-0.9
Private job growth2.9968·68·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs998———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02032764-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain7.3%47·8·-0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents65.370·83·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200065.428·72·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200462.924·55·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200858.326·50·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20126426·55·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.752·82·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.754·82·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.354·82·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.896·77·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.52%22·13·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.51%48·12·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.7%64·90·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.18%90·86·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.4%72·25·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%3677-0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.8%54·70·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.2%24·6·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.63%7·19·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.18%10·15·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90%60·73·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.6%42·12·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.6%66·95·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.54%0·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.4%94·94·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.61%72·65·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.9%2246-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.1%5483-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.0977·95·+0.6
Stroke2.9%2067+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.4%84·52·+1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,630———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,155———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.3%6690-0.7CDC PLACES
Total population5,264———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01113934-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed89———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%2655+0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20%48·70·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units567———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%4479-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50950———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain102———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,121———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,2925471-0.1County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.