placestats

Rich County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2588
Density1.0people per km² of land
Median household income$76,875
Land area2665km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Rich County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Oliver County, ND, Renville County, ND, Sutton County, TX, Stanley County, SD, Skagway Municipality, AK, Sherman County, TX, Steele County, ND, Kane County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Rich Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Other religion adherents110100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.3 sd
Vacancy rate74.6%100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.5 sd
Depression27.5%0th pct15th pct +3.2 sd
Private job growth14.7100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.0 sd
Religious adherents110100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.6 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions8.18%100th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.545494+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.1%6067-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work18,385 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.3%5846-0.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.3%8890-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability30.8%3257+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.6877·64·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.2%452+1.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2137586+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12.8%9698-2.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate10.670·86·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments104———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.664·69·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.8%21+1.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents00·6·-1.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11.4%7284-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort280———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income280———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.1%1611-1.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%5277-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.1%2653+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56%3836-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.956·82·-0.0
Coronary heart disease5.6%3463+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%830+1.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking10.5%9896-2.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.3%8287+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.4974·71·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression27.5%015+3.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%3676-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.33138·61·-0.3
Economic connectedness1.158997+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0114·61·-1.0
Education score1.4994·99·+1.2
Effective property tax rate0.2912·1·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,149———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents02·1·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%5079-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.74888-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%7649+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.3%4381-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.1%2059+1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.2%2459+0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.04499199-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10612·32·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3748899-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$232,430k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.68792·89·+1.3
Hearing disability7.6%1021+1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.8%6487-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.8%8289-0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.4%70·83·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.2%5084-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units3,217———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$13,16783·86·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.7%4472+0.0CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate5338·5·-1.2
Jail population rate68.70·2·-0.7
Labour force1,183———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.2%4679-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.4%10098-1.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.06578197+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy83.7 years9699+1.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.7%3679+0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents04·1·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years74.3%6657+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score1.2995·98·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$78,8474273-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$85,10494·91·+1.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$71,93882·87·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.8 min2661+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age37.2 years16·17·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$74322·25·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$291,20084·84·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$76,875—80—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$78,3328083+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill8464·19·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0452%814-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0145-1.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.5%4674-0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99545·63·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate050·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.19160·50·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity18.2%9496-1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity33%7885-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units817———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents110100·100·+6.3
Owner-occupied housing units657———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,460———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return298·99·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,096———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,074425-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$55,0171853-0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$146,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,665———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,670———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,899———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,947———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,602———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over548———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain203———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,581———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,671———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,466———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain392———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,510———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain7.6%9294-1.6Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000903———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,037———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,006———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,007———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,109———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,369———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,447———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.3
Private job growth14.7100·99·+3.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs875———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.05079299+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.2%32·7·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents110100·99·+2.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200082.985·98·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200489.4100·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.490·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201291.798·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201688.573·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.571·94·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248554·89·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242.115·26·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions8.18%100·92·+2.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.8%74·25·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.6%52·87·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.82%72·51·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.2%36·16·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%3867+0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.2%50·65·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%70·14·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain5.69%0·1·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain6.96%46·58·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago95.3%94·99·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.5%28·5·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married70.1%98·100·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%85·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.5%58·71·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher24.5%5062-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.9%3471+0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.21229·63·-0.7
Stroke2.9%3467+0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication50.9%18·4·-1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,100———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,230———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.4%3972-0.1CDC PLACES
Total population2,588———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed34———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%4272+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate74.6%100·100·+4.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,400———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.3%4472-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50545———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute807———Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.