placestats

Lewis County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9945
Density7.6people per km² of land
Median household income$52,340
Land area1308km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lewis County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Wilkes County, GA, Eastland County, TX, Caddo County, OK, Trinity County, TX, Whitman County, WA, Screven County, GA, Wayne County, TN, Robertson County, KY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lewis Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.26%4th pct9th pct -2.1 sd
Average test score0.088896th pct67th pct +2.0 sd
Lacking social and emotional support20.9%87th pct86th pct -1.8 sd
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.1%6th pct by value42nd pct by value -1.8 sd
Median household income (model-based)$57,91294th pct35th pct +1.7 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.47194th pct79th pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4719479+1.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.3%8651-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work91,235 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%76+1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.4%7431-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability37.9%5716+0.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.978·11·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.8%4920-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.08889667+2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.1%3158+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents044·45·-0.8
Black-white residential segregation40.536·29·-0.4County Health Rankings
Business closing rate4.824·4·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments167———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.026·7·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%2732+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.1462·23·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.7%9645-1.5Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,385———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,385———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.3%1612-1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.7%4514+0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability20.5%299+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.7%2410-0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.948·82·+0.0
Coronary heart disease6.4%7826-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%4130-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.6%3311+0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year52.5%6823+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.914·26·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression26.9%3920+0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.9%9446-1.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.71669·21·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.8929668+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.5651612-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.30872·22·+0.5
Education score0.40967·70·+0.6
Effective property tax rate0.73660·42·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,099———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents37.654·81·+0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health22.8%7830-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.95641-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.26%49-2.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.6%9043-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.2%5319-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.4%6521-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03744971-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13160·80·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4377461-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$316,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.57455·19·+0.1
Hearing disability8.2%3710+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.8%8640-1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%8856-1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.967%8794+1.0County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate77%60·65·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.9%8539-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units4,315———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3922·7·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,43150·50·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.6%7620-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain83.19270-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate5106·5·-0.6
Jail population rate14110·8·-0.3
Labour force4,242———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.8%8534-1.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.9%8786-1.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.03752923-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.4 years9452+1.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.8%9266-1.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents7.0874·55·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years69.6%3819-0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.10192·42·+1.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,6588838+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,63156·26·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,20052·24·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.2 min7658-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age38.2 years18·22·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$62713·8·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$118,90037·20·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$52,340—21—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,9129435+1.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill87554·20·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.102%6881+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.16461+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.6%7825-0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99536·61·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.2160·57·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.9238·13·-1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity31.8%5718+0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity38.2%7850-0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,216———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents010·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units2,476———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,840———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return224·60·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,147———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$26,0182213-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$45,1014616-0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$443,800k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,840———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,818———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,214———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,755———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,313———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,877———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,400———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,349———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,160———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,817———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,805———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,044———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,032———
Poverty rate15.3%8038-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.3%9436-1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4669254-1.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,484———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,644———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,502———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,279———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,456———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,609———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,486———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.5
Preventable hospital stays3,4413824+0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2515·10·-1.4
Private job growth0.69660·34·+0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,881———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02067466+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.8%10·57·-1.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents46.946·48·-0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200054.130·34·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20046246·52·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200858.526·51·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20126428·55·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.248·73·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202078.344·74·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.344·76·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202426.276·94·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.48%12·12·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.1%6·42·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16.5%84·57·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.73%52·48·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.4%35·51·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%8834-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.9%30·42·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic3.04%22·43·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11%16·37·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain1.21%2·2·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.5%50·56·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married35.8%86·84·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married44.6%14·14·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.02%31·42·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain3.27%91·93·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92%78·81·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.55%52·82·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher16.5%6222-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41.1%2818+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.31184·70·+1.1
Stroke3.4%8430-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%27·54·-0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,050———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,074———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.3%8732-1.0CDC PLACES
Total population9,945———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.0225914-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed143———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%6451-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate25.5%78·83·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,099———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.5%8637-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,134———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,927———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,0619461-1.5County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.