placestats

Robertson County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2239
Density8.7people per km² of land
Median household income$52,337
Land area258km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Robertson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Little River County, AR, Wayne County, TN, Clay County, AL, Whitman County, WA, San Juan County, NM, Lincoln County, AR, Screven County, GA, Beckham County, OK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Robertson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Business closing rate00th pct by value2nd pct by value -3.6 sd
Net business formation rate12.8100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.6 sd
Share in the same house a year ago74.8%2nd pct by value1st pct by value -3.1 sd
Share divorced18.9%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd
Poverty rate27.4%2nd pct6th pct +2.8 sd
Preventable hospital stays1,271100th pct95th pct -2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4739679+1.7Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work21,840 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over24%3810+0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.9176·81·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Average test score-0.2085127-0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents036·45·-0.7
Business closing rate00·2·-3.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.896·89·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents014·6·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.3%1812+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort364———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income364———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening59.5%9467+1.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.938·76·-0.3
Dental visit in the past year50%3415-0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.9980·79·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Economic connectedness0.9249874+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.0090418·11·-0.7
Education score0.90296·92·+1.6
Employed786———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents1414·35·-1.3
Fine particulate matter7.85444-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%6844+0.4County Health Rankings
Friending clustering0.13566·85·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4812418+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$37,983k———BEA Regional Accounts
Homeownership rate75.3%48·55·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing units996———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,54251·78·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,43190·83·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Jail admission rate9,24994·95·+0.9
Jail population rate86886·87·+0.0
Labour force832———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy71.7 years2616-0.4County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.349—57·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$323k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents9.3582·69·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years70.1%4422-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.92418·11·-1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$56,6893816-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$59,49188·62·+1.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$48,06068·34·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work33.1 min187+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.7 years24·33·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$5430·3·-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$123,40062·24·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$52,337—21—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,5078228+0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill82852·18·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0483%1418-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.99490+1.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99756·73·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate12.8100·100·+3.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.91562·74·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units791———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents06·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units596———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,800———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return240·73·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,530———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,24348-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$40,695145-1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$94,981k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,334———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,313———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,734———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,799———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,514———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over420———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain573———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line442———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,090———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,255———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,675———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain205———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,193———
Poverty rate uncertain27.4%26+2.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)19.6%2816+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality724128+1.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 2000998———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,090———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,015———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012935———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,013———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,146———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,144———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population44.1%17·25·-0.8
Preventable hospital stays1,27110095-2.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,20767·89·+0.4
Private job growth-0.71940·19·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs138———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02319275+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents23.40·3·-1.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200064.978·70·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200461.950·52·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200854.224·38·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20126330·52·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.442·71·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.736·73·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248150·78·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.130·74·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%2·5·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit18.7%20·67·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains8.79%24·13·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%2·9·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Share aged 65 and over18.8%26·41·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain18.9%100·100·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago74.8%2·1·-3.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.3%34·22·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married47.9%32·25·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.4%90·94·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.94%66·86·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain13.5%269-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.4%2010+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.57390·83·+1.6
Tax returns filed910———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,547———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population2,239———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.050210099+2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed46———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.5%87+1.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain20.6%62·72·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain205———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 50519———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute659———Census ACS 5-year

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.