placestats

Trinity County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,850
Density7.7people per km² of land
Median household income$51,663
Land area1797km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Trinity County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Eastland County, TX, Lewis County, MO, Wilkes County, GA, Smith County, MS, Gilmer County, WV, Alamosa County, CO, Little River County, AR, Robertson County, KY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Trinity Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Arrivals per 100 people staying10.896th pct by value96th pct by value +2.2 sd
Mean travel time to work37.3 min0th pct2nd pct +2.1 sd
Share aged 65 and over27.1%94th pct by value92nd pct by value +1.9 sd
Incarceration of children raised poor here0.0444th pct5th pct +1.8 sd
Share in the same house a year ago80.3%6th pct by value4th pct by value -1.7 sd
Prison population rate1,90195th pct by value98th pct by value +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4084241-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance15.9%1714+1.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work173,490 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.4%3918+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over19.3%7227-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability34.3%8834-1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying10.896·96·+2.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.4%9249-1.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.43298-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.2%839+1.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents3.2368·82·+0.1
Black-white residential segregation57.587·67·+1.1County Health Rankings
Business closing rate12.590·95·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments174———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.264·65·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%6069-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.5182·34·+0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.6%2212+0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.323%66·83·+0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,214———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,214———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.4%6541+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%9430-1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.9%8830-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.5%4218-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.342·82·-0.0
Coronary heart disease6.2%9234-1.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%6539-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.4%9234-1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year52.5%7223+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying8.3794·92·+1.5IRS county migration flows
Depression25.9%5829-0.0CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.8%7132-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.37888·31·+1.4
Economic connectedness0.7536038+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7166431+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.374·22·+0.6
Education score0.13257·52·+0.2
Effective property tax rate1.1185·70·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,838———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents3746·81·-0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health23.1%7928-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.52824+0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.38%6037+0.2County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population uncertain439———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.5%4616-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.7%9231-1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0186582-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1056·29·-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4823017+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$340,650k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.54463·20·+0.3
Hearing disability7.1%9039-1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.6%8135-1.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.4%8146-0.7CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.905%4758+0.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate77.6%66·69·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing units8,261———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.04445+1.8Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,98283·89·+0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$16,17796·90·+1.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.1%8826-1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1074535-0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2722·2·-0.9
Jail population rate90.50·3·-1.6
Labour force5,093———BLS LAUS
Learning rate uncertain0.03149184+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy72.1 years5019-0.2County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents3.3730·23·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years70.4%4424-0.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.56646·18·+0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,8435419-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$60,33884·64·+1.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,16150·20·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work37.3 min02+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age49.8 years92·93·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$82386·45·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$110,10020·14·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$51,663—20—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$49,2772812-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,21980·35·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0763%5455-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.16462+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.1%8529-1.1CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.94613·12·-1.3
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain43.572+1.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.9898·31·-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.2714·10·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.4390·95·+1.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.1%8532-0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity37.8%9253-1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,033———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents012·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units4,682———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return12,340———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return232·65·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,962———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,7069239+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,2318431+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$702,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population14,269———BEA Regional Accounts
Population14,228———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,613———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over11,401———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over10,123———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,756———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,194———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,664———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,618———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined14,095———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,118———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,609———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,602———
Poverty rate16.1%8034-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)18.9%4618-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6533215+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,297———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,213———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,077———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,235———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,985———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,938———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,374———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.7
Preventable hospital stays4,243148+1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,90195·98·+1.7
Private job growth-2.6816·8·-0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,561———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01634040-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents48.144·52·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200059.152·50·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200464.460·60·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086856·75·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201273.868·80·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.462·81·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.858·82·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.366·88·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202425.274·93·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.69%64·39·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit22.6%58·81·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains11.5%58·28·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.58%42·43·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.5%13·25·-1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.4%7725-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.1%94·92·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic8.68%46·66·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced16.5%90·97·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain3.17%71·44·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race10.7%86·71·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago80.3%6·4·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.6%0·6·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54%72·61·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.09%28·44·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic77.3%56·44·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.9%68·86·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.9%5619-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.3%6633-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.09358·43·+0.2
Stroke3.5%7725-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.7%27·57·-0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,330———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,041———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population13,850———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed255———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5%1411+0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate27%80·85·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,228———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.9%7529-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,519———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,656———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost13,1314820+0.1County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.