placestats

Kane County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7996
Density0.8people per km² of land
Median household income$75,000
Land area10,345km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Kane County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Sutton County, TX, San Juan County, CO, Stanley County, SD, Rio Blanco County, CO, Golden Valley County, ND, Inyo County, CA, Hand County, SD, Fallon County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Kane Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Jail population rate4,176100th pct by value99th pct by value +12.4 sd
Incarceration rate4,658100th pct by value99th pct by value +7.5 sd
Current cigarette smoking9.7%100th pct98th pct -3.0 sd
Binge drinking12.7%96th pct98th pct -2.6 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.6598th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.5 sd
Other religion adherents5494th pct by value99th pct by value +2.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4711679-1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.8%6471-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work38,765 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.423%3615+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.5%1849+0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability29.3%3868+0.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.6598·92·+2.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.8%1458+1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2157386+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12.7%9698-2.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate10.266·82·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments295———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed30———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened34———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.674·81·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.8%21+1.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.7512·26·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.9%5876-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort773———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income773———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%2214-0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.3%7887-1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.5%3261+0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.7%6251+0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people28.728·69·-0.6
Coronary heart disease5.2%6682-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%1434+1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking9.7%10098-3.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year67.6%8891+1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.8196·88·+1.8IRS county migration flows
Depression26.8%421+2.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.9%5686-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.58144·73·+0.2
Economic connectedness1.066090+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.02—82—Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0116·61·-0.9
Education score1.387·99·+1.2
Effective property tax rate0.41914·8·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,608———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents5.2218·8·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health16%6686-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.17095-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%6740+0.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.8%5786-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17.5%3271+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.6%4470+0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.009516393-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11534·50·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.444258+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$579,420k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.49480·82·+0.7
Hearing disability7%4444+0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.7%7088-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.7%5080-0.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%—99—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate81.7%84·89·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.5%7992-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units6,264———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate4,658100·99·+7.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,53374·78·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%5682-0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1114630+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,70689·77·+1.1
Jail population rate4,176100·99·+12.4
Labour force3,728———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.8%6888-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.5%9698-1.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.0375—88—Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy78.3 years5281+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.5%4381+0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents1.2614·7·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years72.5%4640-0.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.80158·82·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$70,9522557-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$72,30081·82·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$62,76771·76·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work13.8 min8497-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.7 years64·69·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,12090·82·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$350,90094·90·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$75,000—78—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,2475067-0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,47044·48·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0931%6074-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0165-1.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.9%5682-0.4CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain29.3—16—County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99542·59·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.3666·60·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.8494·91·+1.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity17.9%9897-1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity33.4%6683-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,192———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents5494·99·+2.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,607———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,660———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·68·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,412———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$38,3694473-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,4961247-0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$451,830k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,446———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,425———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,512———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,481———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,750———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,921———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain812———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line730———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,776———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,202———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,870———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,848———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,667———
Poverty rate uncertain10.4%4173+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain8.9%7887-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3486483-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,802———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,051———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,154———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,371———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,505———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,180———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,488———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population7.69%11·4·-1.7
Preventable hospital stays1,1539196-1.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate48231·36·-0.5
Private job growth1.0250·39·+0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,259———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02614283-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.6%18·4·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.258·81·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200085.394·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.760·95·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200872.143·84·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201277.247·88·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201675.317·65·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202073.515·60·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202474.217·58·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-11.14·5·-2.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions7.16%96·89·+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.5%74·31·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.2%32·70·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.56%80·68·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.9%30·14·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%5482-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24%68·83·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain2.09%—81·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain14.4%96·84·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.8%31·45·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.9%24·26·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.6%48·18·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.7%20·73·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic88.7%50·68·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.28%43·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher32.1%9482+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.1%2669+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.041217·52·-1.1
Stroke2.8%4676-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.3%24·6·-1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,910———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,488———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%6884-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population7,996———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.03318995+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed120———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%3859+0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate49%90·99·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units3,072———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%4679-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,553———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,803———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,263—82—County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.