placestats

San Juan County, CO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population690
Density0.7people per km² of land
Median household income$73,889
Land area1004km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like San Juan County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Inyo County, CA, Fallon County, MT, Kane County, UT, Hyde County, SD, Rio Blanco County, CO, Golden Valley County, ND, Hand County, SD, Sutton County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where San Juan Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202433.30th pct by value4th pct by value -5.5 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.112100th pct100th pct +5.2 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202037.10th pct by value6th pct by value -4.9 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-25.20th pct by value0th pct by value -4.6 sd
Median household income (model-based)$102,690100th pct96th pct +4.6 sd
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher47.2%100th pct96th pct +4.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4732079-1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.9%6070-0.5CDC PLACES
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.3%3057+0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability25.6%9692-1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.339·16·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.9%7484-0.8CDC PLACES
Binge drinking20%4020+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0100·45·—
Business closing rate11.894·93·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments61———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed7———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate16.894·99·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%146+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.418·30·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20%439+1.8Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort61———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income61———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.6%9678+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.9%9893-1.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.4%8288-1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.9%2627-0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people99.398·100·+3.9
Coronary heart disease5%9289-1.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%3251+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking11%9694-1.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.9%4666+0.0CDC PLACES
Depression23.2%3257+0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes7.8%9497-1.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.0896·93·+1.4
Economy score1.5874·84·+0.6
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.2944·2·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed430———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents2.2714·2·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health14%9696-1.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.59698-1.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.6%9899+2.3County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress16.2%6888-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.2%8492-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.08250·2·-3.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4056489-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$54,515k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score1.21100·99·+2.7
Hearing disability6.3%9474-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure26%10098-2.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.5%8292-1.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate55.5%0·4·-3.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing units720———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.3%9896-1.7CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate2,02054·50·-0.1
Jail population rate52474·63·+0.0
Labour force446———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents25.880·95·+0.7
Mammography in the past two years69.7%2020-0.8CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$75,3264567-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,45015·22·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain15.2 min7695-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age uncertain42.2 years40·57·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,07688·79·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$406,90094·94·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$73,889—76—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$102,69010096+4.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,19524·34·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.107%7084+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0225-1.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.2%10097-1.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.98814·28·-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.0480·94·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity15.9%10099-1.9CDC PLACES
Obesity25.8%10098-2.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units362———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents28.688·98·+0.8
Owner-occupied housing units201———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return710———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return20·0·-3.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move535———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$46,1929291+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$54,1681650-0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$43,172k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population797———BEA Regional Accounts
Population802———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over630———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over709———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over559———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain143———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line98———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined690———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined797———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago606———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher264———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census705———
Poverty rate (model-based)12.3%1860+0.8Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000436———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004486———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008496———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012506———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016506———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020562———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024588———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population76.7%65·68·+0.5
Private job growth1398·98·+1.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs321———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.112100100+5.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents60.152·76·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200058.52·49·-2.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200446.10·12·-3.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200845.22·18·-2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201244.40·15·-3.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201644.80·11·-4.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202037.10·6·-4.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202433.30·4·-5.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-25.20·0·-4.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%24·5·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit6.38%20·3·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.4%52·86·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%54·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70%26·10·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%9493-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain20.7%36·60·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%77·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain14%92·80·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.8%44·46·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain23%42·15·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.5%54·93·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%87·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic uncertain78.8%32·47·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher47.2%10096+4.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.9%7889-0.9CDC PLACES
Stroke2.5%10094-1.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication50.6%6·3·-1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed470———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken231———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population690———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed16———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%2843+0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate49.7%92·99·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units358———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%7691-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain153———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute295———Census ACS 5-year

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.