placestats

Jones County, SD

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1030
Density0.4people per km² of land
Median household income$64,688
Land area2511km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Jones County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Perkins County, SD, Cherry County, NE, Wibaux County, MT, Hinsdale County, CO, Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Motley County, TX, Roberts County, TX, Borden County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Jones Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median age33.6 years2nd pct by value6th pct by value -2.3 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people98.196th pct by value100th pct by value +2.2 sd
Dental visit in the past year71.3%98th pct98th pct +2.1 sd
Catholic adherents40.696th pct by value97th pct by value +1.8 sd
Sleeping less than 7 hours28.9%98th pct98th pct -1.7 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.0366%8th pct8th pct -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4471268-1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.8%7671-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain6,220 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.6%4262+0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability29.7%4665-0.1CDC PLACES
Arthritis23.1%5070-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.1826482+0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.3%4617+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate022·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments37———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate024·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.7%43+1.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents40.696·97·+1.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain23.5%625+1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort244———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income244———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%7243+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.3%4462+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15%5668-0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.6%8450+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people98.196·100·+2.2
Coronary heart disease5.9%2647+0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%4251+0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.1%1237+0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year71.3%9898+2.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0274·59·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression22.1%5869-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.1%2661+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.35346·62·-0.0
Economy score1.0252·62·-0.0
Education score1.29—98·—
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.1676·73·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed383———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents28.384·68·+0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health17%6276-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.68898-0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%5813+0.3County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress17%6279-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.3%6076-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.12355·67·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4017892-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$79,339k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.062158·48·+0.3
Hearing disability7.5%2824+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.7%3469+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.3%5484-0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate73.5%28·46·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing units478———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability8.1%4464+0.1CDC PLACES
Labour force394———BLS LAUS
Learning rate uncertain0.0552—96—Stanford Education Data Archive
Mainline Protestant adherents18.576·90·+0.7
Mammography in the past two years77.2%9482+1.4CDC PLACES
Mean income of departing households$76,61992·91·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.2 min7495-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.6 years2·6·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$117,10032·19·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$64,688—54—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,6403844-0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,35754·42·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0366%88-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0465-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%4872-0.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99426·51·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate062·35·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity24.3%4067+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity35.5%5472-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units355———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.1156·21·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units261———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return890———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return250·60·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move764———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,059625-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$78,0937891+0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$67,316k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population862———BEA Regional Accounts
Population855———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over762———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over664———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over647———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain223———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line120———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,023———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined851———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago896———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain164———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census917———
Poverty rate (model-based)14.1%3445+0.5Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000664———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004717———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008618———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012609———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016558———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020599———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024550———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays3,074935+1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate97573·79·+0.8
Private job growth-0.42444·22·+0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs235———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0326192+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents87.592·97·+1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200078.842·95·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.860·95·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.954·91·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.958·93·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201686.750·94·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202084.750·91·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.871·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241075·53·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%52·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit4.35%34·2·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains32.6%74·98·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.8%94·35·+1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%3862+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain21.6%28·68·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%86·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87%32·37·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married27%82·43·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.7%60·91·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%79·11·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic82.9%28·54·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain25.3%6465+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours28.9%9898-1.7CDC PLACES
Stroke3.1%2450+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.6%64·24·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed460———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,685———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population1,030———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed11———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%5276-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain25.7%47·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain123———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.6%3661+0.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50262———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute409———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.