placestats

Wibaux County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1148
Density0.5people per km² of land
Median household income$64,792
Land area2304km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wibaux County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Valley County, MT, Motley County, TX, Jones County, SD, Perkins County, SD, Sheridan County, ND, Blaine County, MT, Gilliam County, OR, Stonewall County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wibaux Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net business formation rate17.898th pct by value100th pct by value +2.5 sd
Jail population rate2,81394th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd
Median property tax bill6542nd pct by value10th pct by value -1.7 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population12.8%7th pct by value5th pct by value -1.7 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.648100th pct100th pct +1.7 sd
Poverty rate15.9%5th pct35th pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.648100100+1.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.1%4853-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain8,670 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%5394-0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.9%4667-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability30.1%4062+0.1CDC PLACES
Arthritis24.3%2251+0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score0.4099598+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%229+0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate014·2·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate17.890·99·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2411+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents27.886·90·+0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.5%5057-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort195———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.6%288-0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.4%3859+0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.9%3856+0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.7%2619-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people53.466·96·+0.2
Coronary heart disease5.5%6468-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.3%1621+0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.3%4860+0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.5%2243-0.9CDC PLACES
Depression25.9%1429+1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.6%8890-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.31642·60·-0.1
Economy score0.51912·33·-1.2
Education score-0.3729·23·-0.7
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.70940·39·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed392———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.852·41·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health18.1%3866+0.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.49499-0.9County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.31%6517+0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.2%5472-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.2%1236+1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.5%2653+0.4CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4155883-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$54,099k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.0015766·52·+0.4
Hearing disability7.4%2828+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.4%7282-0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.9%9296-1.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate75%36·54·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.6%5479-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units596———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability8.3%3659+0.3CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate5,61993·88·+0.8
Jail population rate2,81394·98·+2.1
Labour force402———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.2%2159+0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.1%3669+0.0CDC PLACES
Loneliness31.4%3983+0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.556·73·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years67.7%1610-0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.52144·66·+0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,8981630-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain21 min2573+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.2 years36·73·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$96480·69·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$92,30013·6·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$64,792—55—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,1081429-1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill6542·10·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0365-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%5072-0.2CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate17.898·100·+2.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity21.9%7684-0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity33.1%8484-0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units468———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents052·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units351———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return830———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return268·73·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move713———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,6714055-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$47,577624-1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$43,010k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population904———BEA Regional Accounts
Population910———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over906———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over719———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over782———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain272———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain180———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line112———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,130———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined882———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,096———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain202———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census937———
Poverty rate uncertain15.9%535+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.7%4857+0.0Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000518———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004560———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008563———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012544———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016541———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020598———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024546———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population12.8%7·5·-1.7
Preventable hospital stays1,9735480-0.3County Health Rankings
Private job growth-4.3116·5·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs111———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps9.6%68·25·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents5458·66·+0.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.325·91·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200473.925·85·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200872.240·84·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.150·93·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.477·97·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20208765·95·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202486.758·93·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.490·58·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%48·5·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%24·1·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains31%66·97·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.3%14·5·-1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%3862+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.7%38·81·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago95.5%92·99·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain26.2%80·37·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.3%62·92·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90.5%68·75·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain7.95%61·72·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain25.8%7067+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.3%4075+0.3CDC PLACES
Stroke3%4258+0.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.6%40·12·-0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed420———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,025———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.7%3967-0.1CDC PLACES
Total population1,148———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.054101-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed10———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6086-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain21.5%29·75·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain128———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%5268-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain202———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute413———Census ACS 5-year

16of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.