placestats

Dewey County, OK

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4433
Density1.7people per km² of land
Median household income$60,550
Land area2589km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Dewey County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Yuma County, CO, Rush County, KS, Fall River County, SD, Deuel County, NE, Mineral County, MT, Grant County, OK, Hardeman County, TX, Big Horn County, WY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Dewey Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Black Protestant adherents5.58100th pct by value89th pct by value +6.2 sd
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic8.17%100th pct by value97th pct by value +4.1 sd
Lacking social and emotional support25%3rd pct35th pct +2.7 sd
High blood pressure36.3%2nd pct25th pct +2.6 sd
Jail population rate1,419100th pct by value96th pct by value +2.5 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents63.394th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5548496+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.7%4446-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work32,940 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15%3452+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability37%421+2.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.8554·27·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.3%838+1.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1024043-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.9%9275-1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain52.1—40·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents5.58100·89·+6.2
Business closing rate9.5960·72·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments156———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.9548·42·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%7253-0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.0130·49·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.8%3650+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.165%43·17·-0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort809———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income809———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%9043+0.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.6%432+1.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18%429+1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.2%3416-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people62.490·98·+1.1
Coronary heart disease6.4%626+1.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.4%419+1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.1%427+1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.4%1230-1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0668·60·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression26.1%427+1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11%1444+0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.4938·28·-1.6
Economic connectedness1.016785+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8224151-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.71530·44·-0.5
Education score-0.39450·21·-0.0
Effective property tax rate0.60318·27·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,303———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents63.394·98·+2.1
Fair or poor self-rated health20.1%2048+0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.31856+0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%8253+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.7%936+1.7CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.1%839+1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14%2043+0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.0782100100-1.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12764·75·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4138085-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$834,050k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.30718·32·-0.7
Hearing disability8.5%87+1.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure36.3%225+2.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.9%423+2.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.7%28·52·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.5%1243+1.4CDC PLACES
Housing units2,195———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,75581·84·+1.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,77966·69·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.5%1234+1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain149105+1.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,41695·82·+1.7
Jail population rate1,419100·96·+2.5
Labour force2,361———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.3%1240+1.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25%335+2.7CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.03277628+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73 years1028-1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.2%961+1.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents17.560·89·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years68.9%3016-0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.29638·53·-0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$66,4095144-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$52,18160·41·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,40230·25·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.1 min4884-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age38 years4·21·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$90090·60·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$118,20046·20·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,550—42—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,9521829-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill7134·13·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.104%6083+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations27.38698+1.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.2%1028+1.6CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain42.3—3—County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99764·82·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.63940·22·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.2124·8·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.8%1023+1.3CDC PLACES
Obesity38.4%4448+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,595———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,191———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,130———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return292·90·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,646———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,044830-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$63,7776475+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$271,240k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,253———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,286———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,412———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,145———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,848———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over842———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line627———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line581———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,347———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,210———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,919———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher563———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,484———
Poverty rate14.4%2343+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.8%2848+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5561433+1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,220———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,251———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,203———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,093———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,248———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,359———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,215———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population26.3%10·10·-1.4
Preventable hospital stays3,3662826+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate37326·23·-0.6
Private job growth1196·97·+1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,545———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03086890+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps14.9%94·64·+1.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents94.494·99·+1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200072.840·87·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200481.994·96·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.398·99·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201285.696·97·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.894·98·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202090.8100·99·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202490.598·98·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202417.694·80·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.48%94·70·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.9%84·59·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.4%48·80·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%54·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year76%94·58·+1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.9%1840+0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over19%8·43·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain4.6%—87·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.1%74·82·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.02%49·53·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.4%64·54·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.7%68·26·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.5%20·50·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic8.17%100·97·+4.1Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.73%—51·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic81.1%30·50·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.7%60·84·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.8%2639-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.5%1858+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.2178·97·+0.7
Stroke3.3%1435+1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.8%68·59·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,010———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,921———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10%635+1.6CDC PLACES
Total population4,433———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed58———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%5086-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate27.3%78·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units600———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.5%1837+0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50863———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain45———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,725———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,8256051-0.2County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.