placestats

Eddy County, ND

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2319
Density1.4people per km² of land
Median household income$55,389
Land area1632km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Eddy County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Elk County, KS, Knox County, TX, Ferry County, WA, Chase County, KS, Donley County, TX, Piscataquis County, ME, Keweenaw County, MI, Smith County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Eddy Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Economy score1.41100th pct by value79th pct by value +2.9 sd
Median household income (model-based)$66,603100th pct61st pct +2.7 sd
Business opening rate04th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.4 sd
Per capita personal income$82,673100th pct94th pct +2.3 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents36.396th pct by value99th pct by value +2.3 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$76,50898th pct69th pct +2.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5428294+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.8%8671-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work21,490 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths1%00+2.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.2%2432+0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability29.8%8664-1.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.2274·56·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.1%2840+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2878993+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%149+1.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.2360·66·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments63———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate04·2·-2.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1432+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents31.592·93·+1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11.2%10085-2.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.147%18·11·-1.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort339———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income339———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.3%3412-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%7252-0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.7%8872-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.2%9046+1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people42.650·90·+0.1
Coronary heart disease6.1%5238-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%4047-0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%5441-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.2%6657+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.1126·10·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression22%7070-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%5459-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.17372·53·+0.6
Economic connectedness0.9035670+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.41100·79·+2.9
Effective property tax rate0.88931·55·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,165———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.8218·19·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.1%6257-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.67689-0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%164-1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.6%6559-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress16%9490-1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.8%7866-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02694277+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14792·93·+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4542841+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$182,770k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.2252·37·+0.1
Hearing disability7.9%3015+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.6%5860-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.7%5469-0.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate72%18·38·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.6%7666-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units1,338———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate93740·44·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,01560·70·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.5%6854-0.5CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate3,80891·78·+0.3
Jail population rate58974·70·-0.1
Labour force1,199———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.3%6257-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.7%5474-0.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.4 years4641-0.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.6%6080-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents36.396·99·+2.3
Mammography in the past two years71.2%6230+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.49486·64·+0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$76,5089869+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,62044·33·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,60526·15·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.6 min4075+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.7 years64·91·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$61518·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$115,50054·18·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$55,389—28—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$66,60310061+2.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,02716·27·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0503%1420-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations134868-0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.3%8061-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99426·51·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-9.236·1·-1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.1192·93·+1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.3%6859-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity38.8%4243+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,142———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents034·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units822———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,000———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return268·62·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,801———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$38,2649873+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$82,67310094+2.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$188,330k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,278———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,263———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,930———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,680———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,777———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over622———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain283———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line253———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,218———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,200———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,107———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher501———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,347———
Poverty rate uncertain12.8%6756-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.5%9666-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain5324438-0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,268———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,213———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,165———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,157———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,231———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,261———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,205———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population70.5%66·58·+0.5
Preventable hospital stays1,2098496-1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate36019·21·-0.9
Private job growth-1.1335·16·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs524———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02242673-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.2%38·30·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents76.782·93·+0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.624·56·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200455.118·31·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200848.518·25·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201256.620·36·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20166924·47·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20206926·49·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.230·55·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.680·63·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%20·5·-1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.71%0·13·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.2%86·94·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%54·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.6%52·26·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%5044-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.8%56·92·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain3.75%62·85·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain13.7%60·78·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain3.92%30·37·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.9%76·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.9%28·10·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.4%42·57·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.23%42·49·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89%72·70·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.9%96·97·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher28.2%9474+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.1%9488-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.38951·74·-0.1
Stroke3.2%4442-0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%70·64·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,030———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken2,909———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8%7662-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population2,319———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed34———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%5676-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain14.6%4·49·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain196———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5%6049-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50362———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,044———Census ACS 5-year

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.