placestats

Chase County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2579
Density1.3people per km² of land
Median household income$54,518
Land area2002km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chase County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Ferry County, WA, Eddy County, ND, Pondera County, MT, Keweenaw County, MI, Nye County, NV, Colfax County, NM, Elk County, KS, Lincoln County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chase Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Jail admission rate29,262100th pct by value100th pct by value +20.1 sd
Jail population rate8,906100th pct by value100th pct by value +19.7 sd
Incarceration rate9,542100th pct by value100th pct by value +13.0 sd
Business closing rate02nd pct by value2nd pct by value -3.0 sd
Private job growth-210th pct by value0th pct by value -2.8 sd
Net business formation rate11.8100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5197090+0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.3%5041-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work20,900 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.417%4616-0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.1%3838+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability32.4%5846-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.878·2·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.6%4246+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.1136771+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.3%6654-0.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.3
Business closing rate02·2·-3.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments53———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.868·83·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%3444+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.144·60·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.9%8660-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort360———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income360———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%4820+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.3%3037+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.4%6648-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.7%4819+0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people23.314·56·-1.0
Coronary heart disease6.3%3430+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%7269-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.3%3235+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.8%7260+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.6618·5·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression21.7%8274-0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.8%3648-0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.0035362·45·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.9848282+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.93186·57·+1.0
Education score-0.12966·34·+0.2
Effective property tax rate1.683·91·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,032———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.6724·18·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%5851-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter81639+0.9County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%8644+1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.4%5153-0.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain154———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.8%6866-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%7461-0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.01267894-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12968·78·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4425655-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$167,150k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.30694·72·+1.3
Hearing disability7.5%4224-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.1%2846+0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%3056+0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate71.9%16·38·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13%4648-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units1,397———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate9,542100·100·+13.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$13,44776·87·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.7%5850-0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain146236+0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate29,262100·100·+20.1
Jail population rate8,906100·100·+19.7
Labour force1,063———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.5%5753-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.3%7181-0.9CDC PLACES
Life expectancy78 years8679+0.9County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00463—12·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$7k———Census local government finances
Loneliness30.9%7789-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.246·72·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years74.1%8655+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.41180·60·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,3828350+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$55,14754·51·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,70018·12·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.3 min6083-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.5 years40·75·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$75869·28·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$106,20038·12·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$54,518—26—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$62,3029049+1.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,69486·56·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0912%5273-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0125-1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.8%4842-0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99772·82·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate11.8100·99·+2.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.79226·15·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.6%3441+0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity38.8%3443+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,145———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents036·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units823———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,160———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return250·52·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,021———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,5544438-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$67,9037682+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$173,490k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,555———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,579———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,144———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,057———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,872———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over620———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain258———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line274———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,458———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,404———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,295———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher548———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,572———
Poverty rate uncertain10.5%8873-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.4%9667-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain3918473-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,317———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,501———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,384———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,271———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,369———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,491———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,462———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population7.14%13·4·-1.5
Preventable hospital stays7109899-1.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate63656·54·-0.3
Private job growth-210·0·-2.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs493———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03847896+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.7%26·26·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents3020·11·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200068.438·79·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.648·80·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200871.860·84·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127142·73·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201675.436·65·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202076.540·69·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202475.838·62·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.3632·42·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.54%84·56·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.73%4·13·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.4%86·94·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%52·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.5%88·40·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%5444-0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24%38·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain8.12%8·6·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain5.97%52·68·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.07%51·63·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89%52·62·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25%52·28·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married58.4%80·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.37%47·53·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic87%60·64·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.4%54·79·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher29.3%9476+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.9%5071-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.075534·55·-0.4
Stroke3.2%4442-0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.4%100·80·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,130———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,384———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.1%3434+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population2,579———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01984117-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed31———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%6072-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18%16·63·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units252———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5%6449-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50486———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,085———Census ACS 5-year

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.