placestats

Smith County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3579
Density1.5people per km² of land
Median household income$57,024
Land area2319km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Smith County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Knox County, TX, Barber County, KS, Elk County, KS, Donley County, TX, Clearwater County, ID, Eddy County, ND, Greeley County, NE, Piscataquis County, ME. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Smith Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Departures per 100 people staying2.080th pct by value0th pct by value -2.3 sd
Social connection score1.9496th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population0%8th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.9 sd
Membership organisations31.194th pct99th pct +1.9 sd
Poverty rate7.84%100th pct90th pct -1.7 sd
Coronary heart disease5.5%96th pct68th pct -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5338493+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.5%9476-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work25,300 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%7294-1.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.2%8265-0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability29.4%9467-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.6116·7·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.4%6864-0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3359796+1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.5%4234-0.1CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain107—97·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.3
Business closing rate4.296·3·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments119———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.5838·37·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1432+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.8110·32·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.5%8862-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.139%14·8·-1.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort556———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income556———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.3%8840+0.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%9465-1.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.2%8466-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56%8636+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people5684·97·+1.0
Coronary heart disease5.5%9668-1.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.1%7673-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.9%7652-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.4%9474+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying2.080·0·-2.3IRS county migration flows
Depression21.7%7874-0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.2%8681-1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.55796·71·+1.4
Economic connectedness1.039288+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7875044+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.8272·50·+0.6
Effective property tax rate1.6590·92·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,761———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents28.178·68·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health16.3%9683-1.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.15881-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%7427+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.5%9789-1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17.6%8269-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%9682-1.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02218596-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13372·83·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4386460-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$260,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.18292·65·+1.2
Hearing disability6.9%9248-1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%7670-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.5%4059+0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate83%92·93·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.5%9179-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units2,023———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate78926·32·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,10636·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.6%9474-1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain95.38153-0.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,03620·15·-0.4
Jail population rate44451·54·-0.2
Labour force1,805———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.8%9788-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.9%8986-1.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy79 years8887+1.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.000972—6·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$2k———Census local government finances
Loneliness30.4%8692-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents29.492·96·+1.6
Mammography in the past two years74.2%8856+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.68798·76·+1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,2412325-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$40,73110·8·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$39,6252·7·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.5 min8494-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age50 years74·93·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6016·5·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$91,00022·5·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,024—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,5684628-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,50362·49·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.142%8495+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations31.19499+1.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%9672-1.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99994·96·+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.2982·91·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.5384·87·+1.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.4%6650-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity39.6%3235+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,578———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,310———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,430———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return228·36·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,128———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,9837861+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$67,6817682+0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$239,660k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,541———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,590———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,994———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,863———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,663———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,030———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain275———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line421———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,509———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,538———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,230———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher654———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,570———
Poverty rate uncertain7.84%10090-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.9%9063-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain3299488-1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,184———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,370———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,204———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,023———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,042———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,129———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,006———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%8·2·-1.9
Preventable hospital stays3,1092434+0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate34513·20·-0.8
Private job growth8.6194·95·+1.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,022———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03998897+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.8%0·5·-1.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents61.464·78·+0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200074.266·89·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20047768·90·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200879.488·95·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.978·93·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.866·91·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20208466·90·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.866·89·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.650·55·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.26%78·51·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12%14·27·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains29.9%94·96·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%50·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.4%84·39·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%9677-1.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over28.8%82·95·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.5%32·29·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.2%78·76·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%44·17·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.5%74·82·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.02%28·42·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.7%96·90·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.52%63·81·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher24.6%8063+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%4264-0.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.9496·99·+2.0
Stroke2.8%9876-1.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.3%76·67·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,840———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,739———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.9%8363-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population3,579———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed44———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.4%8089-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22%46·76·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units445———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.9%9885-1.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50568———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain61———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,632———Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.