placestats

Beaverhead County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9590
Density0.7people per km² of land
Median household income$58,072
Land area14,355km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Beaverhead County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Throckmorton County, TX, Rosebud County, MT, Owyhee County, ID, Chouteau County, MT, Grant County, OR, Dundy County, NE, Sheridan County, NE, Faulk County, SD. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Beaverhead Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share in the same house a year ago80%0th pct by value4th pct by value -2.8 sd
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher35.5%100th pct88th pct +2.7 sd
Injury deaths69.4100th pct87th pct -2.2 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-7.124th pct by value8th pct by value -2.1 sd
Share widowed4.47%0th pct by value7th pct by value -2.1 sd
Obesity29.3%96th pct95th pct -2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4884284-0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.1%6253-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work77,100 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.5%306+0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.4%8678-1.0CDC PLACES
Any disability29.4%7867-0.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.5188·86·+1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.3%3651+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2959094+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.2%167+1.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0.8196·61·+0.1
Business closing rate9.4358·70·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments343———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed32———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened39———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.564·80·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2419+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents6.7532·44·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.5%7862-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,126———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,126———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.6%308-0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%7265-0.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.1%7467-0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.9%8844+1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.720·66·-1.0
Coronary heart disease5.5%8268-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%3430+0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.2%8274-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.3%8068+0.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.1783·82·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression25.6%1832+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.4%9293-1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.42776·65·+0.7
Economic connectedness0.9625878+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.797—46—Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.92656·56·+0.2
Education score0.89778·92·+1.1
Effective property tax rate0.66530·34·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,579———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents14.848·38·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health17.3%7873-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.36993-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.51%9884+1.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.6%8178-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.4%5053+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%6261-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.00545388-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10631·32·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4366462-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$586,180k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.753100·92·+1.9
Hearing disability7.4%5228-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.9%9486-1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.4%7293-0.7CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%—75—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate67.3%14·21·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.3%8182-0.8CDC PLACES
Housing units4,973———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$16,41886·90·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%6866-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain69.410087-2.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,40252·26·-0.3
Jail population rate15220·9·-0.8
Labour force4,697———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%5463-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.6%6577-0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.0434—91—Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy79.1 years7488+0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.8%7689-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2.530·15·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years73.4%7849+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.49679·64·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,6616451+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$62,02277·68·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,60338·25·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.4 min5087-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years34·67·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$80067·39·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$282,00094·82·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,072—35—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$63,0847651+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,87694·63·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0726%3349-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.45471+0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.1%8880-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99651·70·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.0660·71·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.3481·83·+0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity19.9%10092-1.8CDC PLACES
Obesity29.3%9695-2.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,121———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents2192·98·+1.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,774———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,570———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return28·22·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,294———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,6835255+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$60,7825269-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$601,080k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,889———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,885———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,280———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,156———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,725———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,273———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,347———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,224———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,174———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,488———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,676———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,388———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,371———
Poverty rate14.7%4442-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.9%7055-0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality28710094-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,196———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,242———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,763———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,812———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,849———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,661———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,794———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.2
Preventable hospital stays133100100-1.5County Health Rankings
Private job growth-3.316·7·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,073———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03467394+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.1%32·20·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents45.942·45·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.671·96·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200473.535·84·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086533·68·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201270.629·72·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201674.622·62·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202070.920·54·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202472.518·54·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-7.124·8·-2.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.24%94·67·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.1%48·28·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25%60·90·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.91%68·53·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year69.3%28·8·-0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%7267-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.7%38·81·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain1.66%38·78·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.1%84·81·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.92%41·46·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago80%0·4·-2.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married29.4%82·58·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.1%26·48·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.87%30·37·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.7%64·72·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.47%0·7·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher35.5%10088+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.4%9292-1.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.63962·85·+0.2
Stroke2.9%7267-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.9%18·9·-1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,720———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,095———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.4%6872-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population9,590———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01197068+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed118———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6286-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate17.1%12·60·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units852———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%7868-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,976———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,186———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,101—97—County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.