placestats

Chouteau County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5888
Density0.6people per km² of land
Median household income$56,927
Land area10,289km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chouteau County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Grant County, ND, Rosebud County, MT, Rock County, NE, Wheeler County, NE, Irion County, TX, Cimarron County, OK, Beaverhead County, MT, Throckmorton County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chouteau Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median gross rent$4850th pct by value1st pct by value -1.9 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-8.14th pct by value7th pct by value -1.9 sd
Loneliness35%12th pct35th pct +1.6 sd
Education score1.3592nd pct by value99th pct by value +1.6 sd
Homeownership rate65.9%10th pct by value18th pct by value -1.3 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.043489th pct98th pct +1.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5275292+0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.9%3845-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work43,055 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.818%201+1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.5%6062-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability31.9%4449+0.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.2963·57·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.7%2645+0.4CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2989294+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%229+0.9CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.2
Business closing rate1052·79·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments131———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.470·87·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%6653-0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents27.390·90·+0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.2%4843-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.193%25·31·-0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,149———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,149———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening78.6%204-0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%4452-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.6%4246+0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.3%3017-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people32.230·76·-0.7
Coronary heart disease5.6%6863-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.1%186+1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.4%2234+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.6%3448-0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.3347·39·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Depression25.5%2633+0.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.5%6474-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.0067140·46·+0.1
Economic connectedness0.9866682+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.69136·42·-0.3
Education score1.3592·99·+1.6
Effective property tax rate0.78148·46·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,744———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.0128·10·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%3651+0.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.64489-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%5713+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.4%2445+0.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain67———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.1%1821+1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.6%2433+0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02968697-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10318·26·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4425455-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$429,760k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.010560·52·+0.4
Hearing disability7.9%3015+0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.8%5268-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.2%7894-0.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate65.9%10·18·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.9%2750+0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units2,868———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$14,77079·88·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9%3444+0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1285414-0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,10627·16·-0.7
Jail population rate35554·41·-0.2
Labour force2,819———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.1%2130+0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.6%1540+1.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.9 years3458+0.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness35%1235+1.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents5.1140·39·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years72.4%6239+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.18138·46·+0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,3653225-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$57,08458·57·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,31415·14·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.8 min3280+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.9 years30·63·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$4850·1·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$185,10056·56·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$56,927—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,9038048+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,44671·46·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.106%6984+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.484429-0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.4%5060-0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99320·46·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.3266·75·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.95876·75·+0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity22.7%7279-0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity35.8%5270-0.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,212———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents3.5852·77·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,458———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,480———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return252·59·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,864———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,9782840-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$58,0594263-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$341,210k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,877———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,847———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,762———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,657———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,150———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,323———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line724———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line869———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,829———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,793———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,325———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher939———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,895———
Poverty rate12.4%5459-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15%4039+0.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4055670-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,885———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,921———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,866———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,821———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,603———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,965———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,934———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population82.3%77·78·+1.0
Preventable hospital stays7209599-1.1County Health Rankings
Private job growth2.7762·66·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs815———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04348998+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.3%77·39·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents4232·36·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200074.831·90·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200466.920·68·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200859.316·52·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201264.316·56·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201669.614·49·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202065.612·41·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202466.712·40·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-8.14·7·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.02%76·46·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.7%68·46·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.6%64·95·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.72%64·48·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year69.2%24·8·-1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%4253-0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.5%26·74·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic16.5%—95·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.92%26·12·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.14%—8·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.02%13·27·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.4%56·78·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married29.5%84·59·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52%24·48·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain4.36%48·78·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic75.8%30·42·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.49%79·91·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.6%5055-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.5%3666+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.26842·67·-0.3
Stroke3.2%3242-0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication53.2%40·13·-0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,320———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,195———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.1%2747+0.3CDC PLACES
Total population5,888———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.0282—92—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed75———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%6079-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22.9%44·78·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units656———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.1%3245-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,155———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,170———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain10,967—39—County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.