placestats

Webster County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9942
Density9.1people per km² of land
Median household income$59,964
Land area1091km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Webster County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Van Buren County, TN, Chippewa County, MI, Milam County, TX, Douglas County, OR, Doddridge County, WV, Greene County, IL, Livingston County, MO, Moore County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Webster Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Dental visit in the past year9.2%0th pct2nd pct -9.1 sd
Life expectancy69 years2nd pct4th pct -2.6 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents60.898th pct by value98th pct by value +2.3 sd
Returns claiming the earned income credit25.2%96th pct by value87th pct by value +2.3 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.008110th pct2nd pct -2.3 sd
Years of potential life lost16,0064th pct7th pct +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.42235-0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.2%3542-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work117,000 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13%8466-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability35.1%3530+0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.4358·60·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.8%3831+0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.08256447+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.6%8879-1.3CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain96.692·95·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents1.0162·64·-0.2
Black-white residential segregation32.118·17·-1.0County Health Rankings
Business closing rate5.412·6·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments151———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.4660·51·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.9%6564-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents014·6·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain22.6%1828+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.216%43·44·-0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,838———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,838———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.3%9875+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.2%5640-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.8%4231+0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.9%4636-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people43.396·91·+2.0
Coronary heart disease5.8%7752-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.7%9687-1.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.1%5437-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year9.2%02-9.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.8718·26·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression21.1%9881-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.3%3839+0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.2342·36·-0.1
Economic connectedness0.7713642-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.298·21·-1.3
Education score0.81189·89·+1.3
Effective property tax rate0.57420·23·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,265———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents60.898·98·+2.3
Fair or poor self-rated health20.9%5642-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.43928+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%1815-1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.9%3134+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17.9%9263-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.6%7951-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03856470-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13786·87·+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4049490-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$250,460k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.6794·15·-1.7
Hearing disability7.1%4439-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.3%815+1.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol35.3%45+1.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%6975+0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate78%60·71·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14%3138+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units5,094———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.02923333+0.2Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$10,07770·79·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.2%6340-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1142626+0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,96049·48·-0.3
Labour force4,383———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.7%3335+0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support27.2%317+1.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.03297085+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy69 years24-2.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness36.9%1117+1.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.240·49·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years72.3%5639+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.17658·46·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,3852223-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$51,10942·37·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,0328·10·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29.7 min1617+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.3 years16·39·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6182·7·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$109,50010·14·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,964—40—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,9291626-1.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill6296·9·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0754%3454-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations136468+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.9%3531+0.5CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.36625·36·-0.5
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain3577+1.4County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99896·90·+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.0598·90·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.5684·87·+1.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.6%2324+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity36.3%8366-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,101———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0124·14·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units3,199———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,530———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return298·95·+2.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,455———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,4471222-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$46,8132222-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$467,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,989———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,988———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,923———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,562———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,783———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,863———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,481———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,614———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,801———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,842———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,894———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,363———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,926———
Poverty rate15.1%3639+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.4%1630+0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality73927+2.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,545———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,002———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,439———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,234———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,069———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,395———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,095———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays3,5112222+0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate77657·67·-0.1
Private job growth1.4542·46·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,540———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0081102-2.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.6%8·25·-1.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents6892·86·+1.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200068.384·79·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200473.692·84·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.192·90·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127790·87·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201679.680·78·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.480·80·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.882·84·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.550·70·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.48%50·34·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit25.2%96·87·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains8.66%2·12·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.743%8·13·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.4%100·87·+1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4%4037-0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.7%12·41·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic18.6%91·79·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.6%12·30·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.79%9·8·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.5%62·68·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.7%2·6·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.4%98·90·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic78%36·46·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.25%90·89·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.1%6841+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%7264-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.33414·29·-0.9
Stroke3.4%2930+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication62%98·88·+1.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,040———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken18,966———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.6%7554-0.7CDC PLACES
Total population9,942———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.03739497+1.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed118———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%9479-1.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate19.5%54·69·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units993———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.4%4039-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,081———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain201———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,936———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost16,00647+2.1County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.