placestats

Van Buren County, TN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6293
Density8.9people per km² of land
Median household income$60,281
Land area708km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Van Buren County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Chippewa County, MI, Webster County, MS, Greene County, IL, Doddridge County, WV, Montgomery County, MO, Moore County, TX, Osage County, OK, Grant County, WV. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Van Buren Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net business formation rate-23.80th pct by value0th pct by value -8.7 sd
Business closing rate23.8100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.9 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying4.83100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.5 sd
Business opening rate00th pct by value2nd pct by value -4.0 sd
Social connection score-1.360th pct by value2nd pct by value -3.9 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 202443.6100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.384425-1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.2%3126+0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work77,205 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9194-2.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.4%4437+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability38.3%415+1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.5598·92·+2.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis29.1%45+1.9CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.42608-2.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.1%8872-1.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents050·45·-0.5
Business closing rate23.8100·100·+6.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments38———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate00·2·-4.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1319+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents010·6·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain23.6%1224+1.0Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort885———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income885———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83%7752+0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.2%28+2.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability20.6%09+1.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.7%1010-1.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.782·82·+1.0
Coronary heart disease6.7%416+1.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.2%3125+0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking21.6%27+2.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year51.7%2420-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.7212·22·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression31.7%02+2.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.8%2532+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.72213·21·-1.3
Economic connectedness0.597411-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.1012·14·-2.1
Education score0.65383·82·+0.9
Effective property tax rate0.3992·6·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,747———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents23.254·59·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health23.9%1723+0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.78670-0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%7444+0.5County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress22.4%43+2.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16%414+1.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.07262843+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13378·83·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4178881-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$128,940k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.62310·17·-1.6
Hearing disability7.9%1715+1.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure36.8%1323+1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.9%89+1.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate84.7%92·96·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,915———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,76976·84·+0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$26,05594·96·+1.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.7%418+1.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1251016+1.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate5,84193·89·+0.9
Jail population rate1,67894·97·+1.3
Labour force2,848———BLS LAUS
Learning rate uncertain0.04959695+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy70.4 years68-1.9County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents0.310·2·-1.3
Mammography in the past two years68.1%1012-1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.24158·49·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,0891222-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$75,42586·84·+1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,37048·39·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work31 min613+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.2 years88·86·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$70514·17·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$149,20046·37·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,281—41—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$58,5843237-0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill5962·8·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0583%1229-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations005-2.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.9%1722+1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99332·45·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-23.80·0·-8.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying4.83100·100·+4.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity28.6%4035+0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity38.7%4845+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,462———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents010·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units2,086———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,610———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return292·92·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,762———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$27,404218-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$36,56101-2.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$240,420k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,576———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,493———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,237———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,159———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,562———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,509———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain843———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line942———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,087———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,408———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,734———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher638———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,168———
Poverty rate uncertain13.8%5648-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.7%3840+0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality72948+1.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,131———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,346———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,206———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,300———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,419———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,921———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,265———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population37%12·17·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays2,5795657-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate49220·37·-0.9
Private job growth0.78934·35·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs383———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01461229-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents23.54·3·-1.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200040.20·7·-2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200448.14·15·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200860.442·56·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201261.320·48·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.256·70·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.284·83·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.884·87·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202443.6100·100·+3.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.84%24·19·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit18.1%64·64·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.2%26·32·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.84%38·52·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.8%42·43·+0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%2334+0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24%80·82·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.7%72·78·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.1%86·84·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.9%4·7·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married58.1%88·85·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.67%61·63·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.1%92·96·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain7.18%34·55·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher14%1210-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.5%822+1.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.360·2·-3.9
Stroke3.4%2330+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57%27·28·-0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,710———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,063———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population6,293———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.03879797+1.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed101———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.5%5846-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain15.5%40·53·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain453———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.6%2735+0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,201———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,491———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost15,54468+1.9County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.