placestats

Washington County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population20,989
Density20.8people per km² of land
Median household income$90,188
Land area1010km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Washington County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Addison County, VT, Cass County, NE, Le Sueur County, MN, Miami County, KS, Dodge County, MN, Leelanau County, MI, Wilson County, TX, Gallatin County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Washington Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Frequent mental distress14.2%96th pct99th pct -2.5 sd
Lacking social and emotional support18.5%100th pct99th pct -2.1 sd
Injury deaths51.798th pct98th pct -2.1 sd
Current asthma9%98th pct98th pct -2.0 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.9 sd
Cognitive disability11.4%100th pct99th pct -1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5359893+1.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain7.4%6890-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work224,880 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over8.9%7092-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability24.2%8496-1.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.1328·55·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.8%7685-0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2758792+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.7%21+1.7CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain55.162·48·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents064·45·-0.4
Business closing rate9.6664·74·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments571———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed55———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened58———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.236·64·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%186+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents10.354·58·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain6.5%9298-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.131%20·6·-0.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,455———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,455———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83%2052-0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.9%8293-1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability11.4%10099-1.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59.7%4269-0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people12.540·22·-0.4
Coronary heart disease4.8%8493-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9%9898-2.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.3%7088-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year69.6%8896+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.2850·66·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression18.7%9894-1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.5%6091-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.394·97·+1.2
Economic connectedness1.158897+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.210095+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score2.0378·93·+0.7
Education score1.1896·98·+1.5
Effective property tax rate1.4888·87·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed11,096———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.454·39·-0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health13%9498-1.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.28879-0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.46%3267-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity9.5%8998-1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain353———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress14.2%9699-2.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.4%9498-1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02067681-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10748·33·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4185280-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,849,500k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.81274·94·+0.8
Hearing disability6.1%4881-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.8%5887-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.6%5881-0.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.97%10095+1.5County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate82.2%64·90·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity7.8%9799-1.3CDC PLACES
Housing units8,665———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2935·2·-1.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$76020·42·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6%10098-1.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths51.79898-2.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,18618·19·-0.7
Jail population rate59.70·2·-1.5
Labour force11,343———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation5.6%9799-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support18.5%10099-2.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.0399189+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy79.9 years7892+0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness28.5%10099-1.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents18.592·90·+1.0
Mammography in the past two years74.3%3457-0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score1.388·98·+1.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$109,3408694+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$76,75356·86·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$75,99378·90·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.2 min7858-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.6 years68·61·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$95830·68·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$278,30044·82·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$90,188—92—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$88,2347491+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill4,10688·93·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0852%5666-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.562422-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.5%7695-0.8CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain9.619388-1.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.98462·19·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.52632·43·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.14210·34·-1.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity21.7%4285+0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity40.8%223+1.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units8,391———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents082·78·-0.4
Other religion adherents2.5464·65·+0.1
Owner-occupied housing units6,897———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return20,390———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return264·70·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move18,357———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$46,1147691+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$73,4807688+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,556,500k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population21,182———BEA Regional Accounts
Population21,152———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over16,867———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over16,193———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over14,367———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,964———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,434———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,276———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined20,762———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined20,918———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago18,831———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher5,246———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census20,865———
Poverty rate6.91%7894-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)6.1%9698-1.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2708896-1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20008,626———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20049,950———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 200810,320———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 201210,246———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 201610,832———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 202012,413———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 202412,545———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.9
Preventable hospital stays1,4739492-1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate23331·9·-0.7
Private job growth6.8784·92·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs7,106———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02276074+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain6.5%11·3·-1.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents46.776·47·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.388·81·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20047286·81·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.474·63·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201268.878·68·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201673.978·60·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202070.774·53·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202471.574·50·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242.1436·26·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.17%52·84·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit7.04%4·4·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.7%80·89·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.06%20·23·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.3%52·38·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.5%9097-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.9%50·42·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.25%8·7·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.68%20·20·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.16%24·28·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.7%66·70·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%76·83·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.5%30·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.7%92·95·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.79%38·35·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.3%90·89·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed5.5%46·20·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher36.5%7689+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours27.6%9899-1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.75682·89·+0.9
Stroke2.5%6294-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%74·54·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed10,370———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken30,621———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.4%8998-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population20,989———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.01547276+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed247———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.2%8493-1.1BLS LAUS
Vision disability3.3%8897-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 504,301———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain237———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute9,696———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost4,8029498-1.5County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.