placestats

Grant County, WV

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population10,972
Density8.9people per km² of land
Median household income$61,530
Land area1236km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Grant County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cass County, IA, Moore County, TX, Tehama County, CA, Ralls County, MO, Doddridge County, WV, Mason County, IL, Benton County, IN, Greene County, IL. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Grant Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Friending clustering0.165100th pct by value98th pct by value +3.5 sd
Economic connectedness in high school0.3690th pct1st pct -3.5 sd
Arthritis31.5%2nd pct2nd pct +3.4 sd
Sleeping less than 7 hours47.3%0th pct1st pct +3.3 sd
Frequent mental distress22.9%0th pct2nd pct +3.3 sd
Private job growth13.5100th pct by value98th pct by value +3.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3981034-1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain8.8%7471-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work110,700 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.316%4640-0.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.4%1831+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability36.8%2222+1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.774·9·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis31.5%22+3.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1673132-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.2%8671-1.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents054·45·-0.5
Black-white residential segregation31.326·16·-0.8County Health Rankings
Business closing rate9.6160·73·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments228———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.7346·39·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%819+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.5224·25·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.5%3037+0.5Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,465———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,465———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.2%9673+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.5%416+1.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.5%1216+1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.8%10084+1.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.490·84·+1.4
Coronary heart disease6.5%822+1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.1%66+2.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.2%413+1.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year50%1415-0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.580·4·-2.1IRS county migration flows
Depression31.4%23+2.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.2%1227+1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.36727·31·-0.6
Drug overdose deaths uncertain47.8—18—County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.8265055-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.36901-3.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.3298·23·-1.4
Education score0.50757·76·+0.4
Effective property tax rate0.3310·3·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,280———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.332·39·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health22.9%2229+0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.69889-1.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%2015-0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16%4048-0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22.9%02+3.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.8%616+1.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.006959292-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.165100·98·+3.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4237875-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$584,590k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.770·11·-2.1
Hearing disability7.3%3131+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure36.9%1022+1.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol35.3%25+1.9CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%6375+0.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate80.9%78·85·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13%4348-0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units5,660———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,01547·50·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,81968·79·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.1%1226+1.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths15205+2.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,10913·16·-0.9
Jail population rate57678·68·+0.1
Labour force5,502———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9%4044+0.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.6%5452-0.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.3 years3441-0.3County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.7%2340+0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents16.582·87·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years73.6%6650+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.15840·45·-0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,472417-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$52,86956·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,05110·16·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25.1 min4244+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.9 years88·85·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6124·6·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$167,50068·48·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,530—45—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,187421-1.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill5550·7·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0978%7278+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.76072+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15%2530+0.7CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain33.7168+1.1County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99998·93·+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.87338·20·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.1946·50·-0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.8%1223+1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity43.3%68+1.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,284———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents2.2970·61·+0.1
Owner-occupied housing units3,466———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,700———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return218·34·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,950———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,0182835-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$48,2902627-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$530,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,985———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,921———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,228———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,803———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,109———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,703———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,458———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,787———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,863———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,765———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,060———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,455———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,976———
Poverty rate13.4%4851+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.6%829+1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5253040+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,534———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,047———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,218———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,586———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,956———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,509———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,568———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population39.6%15·19·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays4,37267+1.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate74545·64·-0.1
Private job growth13.5100·98·+3.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,687———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01451028-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps17.6%89·78·+1.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents36.726·24·-0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20008098·96·+2.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.896·95·+1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200876.190·91·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20128498·95·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.598·98·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202088.9100·97·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202490100·98·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.9324·52·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.15%0·7·-1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.7%60·58·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains11.7%14·29·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.98%90·91·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78%96·83·+1.5CDC PLACES
Safety score-1.56—8·—
Self-care disability3.7%6148-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.6%90·85·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.7%86·88·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.7%92·89·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.9%20·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.8%46·59·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic96.1%100·99·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.59%84·83·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17.9%4429-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours47.3%01+3.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.00059832·49·-0.4
Stroke3.2%4942-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.2%92·78·+1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,220———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,799———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.2%1125+1.4CDC PLACES
Total population10,972———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.02177886+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed222———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4%3230+0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate24.3%80·81·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,376———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%6352-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,970———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,405———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost11,6442233+0.7County Health Rankings

5of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.