placestats

Thomas County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population626
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$72,708
Land area1846km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Thomas County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Haines Borough, AK, Treasure County, MT, Banner County, NE, White Pine County, NV, Kent County, TX, Pershing County, NV, McCone County, MT, Wayne County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Thomas Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations59.6100th pct100th pct +5.0 sd
Social connection score3.62100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.4 sd
Share now married77.5%98th pct by value100th pct by value +2.2 sd
Share aged 65 and over33.1%96th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people89.792nd pct by value100th pct by value +2.0 sd
Private job growth-134th pct by value1st pct by value -1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5496395+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.4%7277-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain5,355 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.9%2653+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability24.9%9694-1.2CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.2%8690-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3248395+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.6%144+1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate13.684·97·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate020·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%3819+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents18.270·78·+0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain22.7%1028+1.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort123———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income123———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%6643+0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%8890-0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability11.8%10098-1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.9%6044+0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people89.792·100·+2.0
Coronary heart disease4.8%9493-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.2%9696-1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.9%8285-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.5%7687+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.4574·70·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression18.2%9696-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.3%8294-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.1998·95·+1.1
Economy score0.76916·47·-0.8
Education score-0.96927·6·-0.5
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.0974·69·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed330———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents14.866·38·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health13.8%9296-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.24894-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.37%7534+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.4%9794-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress14.6%9698-1.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.7%9296-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.10110·22·-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3719099-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$43,654k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.090368·59·+0.3
Hearing disability6.2%8878-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.3%7890-0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.1%8495-0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate69.8%26·29·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.7%9497-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units367———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.3%9496-1.0CDC PLACES
Labour force345———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6%9797-0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.6%8290-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0829—2—Stanford Education Data Archive
Loneliness30.3%7993-0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents16.772·88·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years74.1%6255+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0993·94·+0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$48,99124-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$55,00036·58·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16.9 min4691-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age uncertain45.1 years70·78·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$113,00013·16·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$72,708—74—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,8441032-1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,22828·36·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0641%1737-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations59.6100100+5.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.7%8894-0.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99649·70·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-13.64·0·-1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23.5%4074+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity37.2%2259+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units318———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents044·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units222———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return610———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return224·30·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move558———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$42,1577885+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,3305679-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$44,773k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population675———BEA Regional Accounts
Population677———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over534———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over525———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over505———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over207———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain88———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined626———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined677———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago586———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher136———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census669———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain13%2654+0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000395———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004444———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008390———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012408———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016393———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020427———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024393———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth-134·1·-1.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs147———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.05118899+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.9%12·5·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents49.858·55·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200085.784·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200486.384·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200886.689·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201289.689·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20169284·99·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.373·98·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.871·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20243.127·29·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%46·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit6.06%34·3·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains33.3%86·98·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.1%78·30·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%9295-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over33.1%96·99·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%38·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%73·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.6%82·97·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain13.3%10·0·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married77.5%98·100·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%85·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic88.2%62·67·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher26.9%7170+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.9%8094-0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score3.62100·100·+3.4
Stroke2.5%9694-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.9%80·43·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed330———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,413———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.8%9795-0.9CDC PLACES
Total population626———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.052131-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed15———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.3%1821+0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.4%2·43·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain49———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.5%9295-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50108———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute316———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.