placestats

Kent County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population727
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$71,420
Land area2338km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Kent County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Banner County, NE, Thomas County, NE, Haines Borough, AK, Treasure County, MT, McCone County, MT, White Pine County, NV, Grant County, NE, Wayne County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Kent Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Evangelical Protestant adherents76100th pct by value99th pct by value +5.4 sd
Net business formation rate37.5100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.7 sd
Business opening rate37.5100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.6 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.9100th pct by value90th pct by value +2.3 sd
Median age57.6 years100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.1 sd
Religious adherents88.496th pct by value98th pct by value +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5074788-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.4%1625+1.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain3,860 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%6994-1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7.3%9297-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability28%7078-0.4CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.2%8690-1.1CDC PLACES
Binge drinking20.3%4817+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate020·2·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate37.5100·100·+3.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.9%8064-0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents6.6444·43·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.6%6267-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort108———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.1%9885+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%9090-0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.2%6278-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.6%8459+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people66.484·99·+0.8
Coronary heart disease4.7%9895-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.8%7685-0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.1%8890-0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.6%3448-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.9890·90·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression24%4049+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%4078-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.84278·86·+0.6
Economy score1.154·66·+0.0
Employed311———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents76100·99·+5.4
Fair or poor self-rated health17.1%5275-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter61482+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.13%191-1.1County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress17.6%4869+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.9%7283-0.5CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3956894-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$222,010k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.29824·33·-0.2
Hearing disability5.8%9888-1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.4%6082-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.6%1858+1.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate77%64·65·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing units484———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3,463—98·—
Independent-living disability7.1%7486-0.5CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate4,15179·80·+0.5
Jail population rate1,83587·97·+1.0
Labour force323———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents5.8440·46·-0.5
Mammography in the past two years75.4%7667+0.8CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$72,3315261-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$75,54590·90·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.8 min6294-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age57.6 years100·99·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$85641·52·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$71,420—71—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$62,4373449-0.5Census SAIPE
Membership organisations0565-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.1%5480-0.3CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate37.5100·100·+4.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity22.4%5481-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity33.1%7084-0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units274———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents046·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units uncertain211———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return650———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return270·85·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move589———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,0874057-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$70,4737085+0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$51,304k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population728———BEA Regional Accounts
Population734———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over617———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over557———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over565———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain242———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line79———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined670———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined681———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago639———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain152———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census753———
Poverty rate (model-based)11.6%5465-0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000536———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004522———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008448———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012405———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016434———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020462———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024445———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population47.1%31·28·-0.2
Preventable hospital stays2,6213556+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,628—97·—
Private job growth-11.86·1·-1.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs202———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents88.496·98·+2.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200065.29·71·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200473.525·84·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.657·93·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201283.561·95·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201685.941·93·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.780·98·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248859·95·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.9100·90·+2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%50·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%24·1·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.8%34·68·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.4%66·25·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.9%7487-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain33.3%98·99·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%41·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%78·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.9%46·47·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain15.2%16·1·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59%46·88·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%86·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic83.4%42·55·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain26.9%6770+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.4%1852+1.0CDC PLACES
Stroke2.6%8490-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication55.8%64·19·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed320———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken924———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population727———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.04659199+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed12———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.7%2839+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate43.4%92·98·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain210———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%5679-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain77———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute uncertain244———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.