placestats

Banner County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population657
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$71,250
Land area1932km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Banner County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Kent County, TX, Haines Borough, AK, Thomas County, NE, White Pine County, NV, Wayne County, UT, Grant County, NE, Treasure County, MT, Pershing County, NV. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Banner Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median age56.6 years98th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd
Median property tax bill2,51693rd pct by value79th pct by value +1.9 sd
Share now married75.4%96th pct by value100th pct by value +1.9 sd
Effective property tax rate1.5193rd pct by value88th pct by value +1.9 sd
Share never married10.6%2nd pct by value0th pct by value -1.6 sd
Religious adherents17.74th pct by value1st pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5365593+0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.6%4859-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain6,835 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%6694-1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.2%7485-0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability26%8690-0.9CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.4%8289-0.9CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22%268+0.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate020·2·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate022·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%5032+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents012·6·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.6%3851+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort181———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%6643+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.3%7687-0.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.3%9296-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.9%3827-0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people29.724·71·-0.8
Coronary heart disease5.2%6082-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%9294-1.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13%8084-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year68.4%9093+1.0CDC PLACES
Depression18.3%9496-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9%5284-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.95886·90·+0.8
Economy score1.4382·80·+0.7
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.5193·88·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed323———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents14.866·38·-0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health14.8%8493-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.53491+0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%5115+0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.7%7387-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress14.8%9297-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.1%8493-0.9CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3679299-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$58,539k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.25726·35·-0.2
Hearing disability6.6%7462-0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.1%6885-0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.7%6290-0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate75.6%46·57·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.5%7692-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units351———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.7%8492-0.8CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate2,73262·66·-0.1
Jail population rate1,12284·92·+0.4
Labour force334———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.5%8892-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20%8895-0.9CDC PLACES
Loneliness30.2%7993-0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2.8230·18·-0.8
Mammography in the past two years77.4%9483+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.1995·97·+1.1
Mean travel time to work24.1 min1252+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age56.6 years98·99·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$97572·70·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$166,30047·47·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$71,250—70—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,3075663+0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,51693·79·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0545-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.4%7488-0.6CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate056·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity24.6%2665+0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity38.1%1450+1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units258———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents048·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units195———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return610———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return292·95·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move518———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,6505065-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$80,9998093+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$54,350k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population671———BEA Regional Accounts
Population674———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over557———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over520———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over524———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over189———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line78———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined657———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined672———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago618———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain171———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census674———
Poverty rate (model-based)11.6%5665-0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000462———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004437———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008416———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012411———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016402———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020410———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024386———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population71.9%62·61·+0.5
Private job growth-4.2618·5·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs45———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps uncertain8.1%36·13·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents17.74·1·-1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200085.786·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200487.189·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.984·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201286.377·98·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201694.998·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.471·98·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202491.177·99·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.3941·35·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%50·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%24·1·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.6%58·95·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.7%94·34·+1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.9%7487-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over28.8%88·95·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%39·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain6.1%7·1·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.1%86·98·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain10.6%2·0·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married75.4%96·100·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%86·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.4%78·83·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher32.6%8683+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours29.3%9698-1.4CDC PLACES
Stroke2.6%8490-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.8%94·59·+1.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed290———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,105———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.4%7988-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population657———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed11———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%3855-0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain26.5%55·84·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain93———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.9%7485-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain126———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute284———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.