placestats

Greeley County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2211
Density1.5people per km² of land
Median household income$58,894
Land area1476km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Greeley County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Osborne County, KS, Tripp County, SD, Kimball County, NE, Clearwater County, ID, Yuma County, CO, Adams County, ID, Barber County, KS, Rush County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Greeley Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Catholic adherents68.698th pct by value100th pct by value +3.9 sd
Religious adherents11198th pct by value99th pct by value +2.2 sd
Business opening rate16.298th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.602100th pct99th pct +2.1 sd
Returns reporting capital gains33.6%98th pct by value99th pct by value +2.1 sd
Material security score0.90598th pct by value87th pct by value +1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.60210099+2.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.5%7461-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work17,770 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.667%92+1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.8%8675-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability26.5%10088-1.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.7124·8·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.1%9691-1.9CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.4%126+1.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate7.3524·25·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments71———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate16.298·98·+2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1832+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents68.698·100·+3.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.3%9274-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort542———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income542———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.8%4017-0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.1%8668-1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.2%9689-1.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52%2811-0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people45.762·92·+0.2
Coronary heart disease5.5%8868-1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%8894-1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.2%7461-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.9%7066+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.7614·6·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression18.2%9696-1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%7678-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.74398·81·+1.5
Economic connectedness1.159497+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0984·65·+0.8
Effective property tax rate1.5680·90·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed919———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.148·49·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health15.7%10088-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.86586-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.33%5422+0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.5%8479-1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.6%9293-1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.7%9686-1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.05719499-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12454·68·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3939095-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$182,720k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.487100·82·+1.8
Hearing disability7%8244-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.8%7678-0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.4%9093-1.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate82.3%86·91·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10%9486-1.2CDC PLACES
Housing units1,202———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-47434·36·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%9282-1.6CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate74510·8·-1.1
Jail population rate99.97·4·-1.2
Labour force943———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.9%8886-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.4%6380-0.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy81.2 years9697+1.9County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.3%8193-0.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents23.276·94·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years75.7%9270+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.90598·87·+1.9
Mean income of arriving households$45,41030·19·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,88538·26·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.8 min5285-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.5 years42·75·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$64319·9·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$87,80014·4·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,894—37—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,6866844+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,37246·43·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.054%1823-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations22.58096+0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11%9481-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99434·52·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate8.8298·98·+1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.050250·38·+0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26%6654-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity35.3%7473-0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units941———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents036·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units774———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,110———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return274·71·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,993———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,0282235-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$77,9958891+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$172,990k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,218———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,219———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,779———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,694———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,534———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over571———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain244———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain237———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,183———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,194———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,052———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher283———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,188———
Poverty rate uncertain11.2%7068-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain10.8%9672-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain2779895-1.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,310———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,248———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,199———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,185———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,175———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,258———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,235———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,6437889-0.9County Health Rankings
Private job growth-1.5320·13·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs386———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03388093+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.2%28·21·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents11198·99·+2.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200066.922·75·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200470.636·77·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086120·57·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201270.730·73·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201681.342·83·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.644·84·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.352·88·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202417.488·79·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.87%38·19·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.2%18·22·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains33.6%98·99·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%50·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.7%36·19·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%9277-1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.8%56·89·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.14%6·2·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.8%96·94·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.3%44·16·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61%90·94·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.5%82·84·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.49%55·81·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.4%2232-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.8%5879-0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.3184·97·+0.9
Stroke2.9%8667-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.2%54·48·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,070———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,134———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.9%9181-1.4CDC PLACES
Total population2,211———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.02176886+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed24———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6286-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate21.7%53·75·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units261———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%9079-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50372———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute946———Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.