placestats

Barber County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4153
Density1.4people per km² of land
Median household income$57,615
Land area2937km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Barber County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Clearwater County, ID, Smith County, KS, Donley County, TX, Tripp County, SD, Greeley County, NE, Knox County, TX, Elk County, KS, Adams County, ID. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Barber Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.856th pct by value1st pct by value -1.7 sd
Social connection score1.8188th pct by value99th pct by value +1.6 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.312nd pct by value1st pct by value -1.6 sd
Share widowed6.14%0th pct by value33rd pct by value -1.6 sd
Share now married62.9%98th pct by value96th pct by value +1.5 sd
Membership organisations29.188th pct99th pct +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5126089+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.3%8264-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work30,545 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.6%5648-0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability31.7%6251-0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.312·1·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.3%5251+0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1367375+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18%5442-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.4
Business closing rate7.0120·19·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments157———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.0122·15·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%4444+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents24.686·87·+0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.3%7258-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort687———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income687———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.4%6624+0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7%4243-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.3%6650-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.1%3411-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people44.956·92·+0.2
Coronary heart disease6%5842-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%6260-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.1%3637+0.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.9%5049+0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1642·34·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression22.6%6263-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10%6264-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.16772·53·+0.6
Economic connectedness18184+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8195651+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.80562·49·+0.3
Education score0.0088671·43·+0.4
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.6692·93·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,988———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents25.472·63·-0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health18.5%7463-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.42353+0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.16%62-1.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.8%7166-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.2%5257-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.8%8066-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.000526590-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13986·88·+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4464249-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$257,910k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.5524·20·-0.6
Hearing disability7.3%6631-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.3%4254+0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%3456+0.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate81.3%80·87·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.1%5060-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units2,461———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate72215·27·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$54332·41·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.4%7857-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1076435-0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,93547·47·-0.2
Jail population rate28127·28·-0.3
Labour force2,045———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.7%7769-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.9%8586-1.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.2 years4039-0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness29.9%9495-1.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents18.470·90·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years71.9%6435+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.31469·54·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,3594638-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$41,31814·10·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$40,77610·10·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.1 min8695-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.6 years34·61·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$74348·25·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$92,70026·6·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,615—34—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,5147440+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,54270·51·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.167%9498+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations29.18899+1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.1%5851-0.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share1100·100·+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate048·35·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.856·1·-1.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.1%4845-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity38.6%4846+0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,806———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0544·20·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,469———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,810———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return252·56·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,374———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,6206455+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$60,0485667+0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$244,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,078———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,071———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,291———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,137———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,824———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over963———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain716———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line468———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,058———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,000———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,670———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher766———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,228———
Poverty rate uncertain17.6%1926+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.7%9265-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5084844-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,498———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,403———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,462———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,314———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,252———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,342———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,170———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population80%76·75·+0.7
Preventable hospital stays3,826615+1.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate44138·31·-0.6
Private job growth037·26·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs905———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02744886-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.7%15·17·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents68.568·87·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200073.456·88·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200475.254·87·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.468·90·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201278.666·90·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201686.680·94·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202087.488·96·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202486.680·93·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.282·65·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.53%68·35·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.1%34·35·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.2%62·83·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%50·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.5%66·33·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%7657-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.2%38·78·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain2.05%—80·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10%24·22·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.12%51·54·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.4%58·54·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.9%18·7·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married62.9%98·96·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.14%6·16·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic88.8%68·69·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.14%0·33·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher27.1%9471+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.6%5673-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.8188·99·+1.6
Stroke3%7858-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%88·70·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,980———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,952———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.3%4443+0.0CDC PLACES
Total population4,153———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01573824-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed57———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%5476-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate26.6%64·85·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units655———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.6%7661-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50735———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,024———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain10,1216548-0.4County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.