placestats

Noble County, OH

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population14,252
Density13.8people per km² of land
Median household income$55,360
Land area1031km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Noble County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Alleghany County, VA, Matagorda County, TX, Bee County, TX, Pittsburg County, OK, Audrain County, MO, Morgan County, OH, Curry County, NM, Brown County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Noble Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership of volunteering groups0.215%100th pct100th pct +3.6 sd
Life expectancy80.7 years100th pct95th pct +3.1 sd
Per capita personal income$33,3540th pct0th pct -2.7 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.4962nd pct10th pct +2.4 sd
Share divorced17.8%96th pct by value99th pct by value +2.3 sd
Premature mortality33798th pct85th pct -2.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4689678+1.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.8%7357-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work100,150 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.333%2332+0.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over25%108+1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability30.9%9557-1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.2110·15·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.4%4125+0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1136841+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19.3%525+1.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents030·45·-0.6
Business closing rate6.8516·17·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments206———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.3130·32·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1619+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.5470·51·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.2%9864-2.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.197%25·33·-0.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,770———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,770———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.7%3929-0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.3%3219+0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.6%8946-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.7%4834-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people24.136·57·-0.3
Coronary heart disease7%510+1.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%5739-0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.7%2515+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.9%6032+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.968·8·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Depression27.3%2517+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.8%4832-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.11393·50·+1.3
Economic connectedness0.8188253+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6785625+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.22730·18·-0.4
Education score-0.44616·19·-1.2
Effective property tax rate0.78952·47·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,106———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents11.320·27·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health21.1%7541-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.46453-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%9271+1.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.6%8351-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.3%4118+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.7%6131-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01088886-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14894·94·+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.496210+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$527,350k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.072989·57·+1.3
Hearing disability7%6144-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.3%5031-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%7349-0.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate81.9%88·89·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.5%8654-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units5,797———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate88420·40·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$4,80862·61·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.9%9546-1.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths75.49080-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,45027·28·-0.6
Jail population rate33623·38·-0.8
Labour force4,344———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.5%9253-1.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.9%6459-0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02583936-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy80.7 years10095+3.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0965—37·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$435k———Census local government finances
Loneliness36.3%2522+0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.0554·47·-0.0
Mammography in the past two years72.9%6044+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.10268·42·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,1238037+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,86942·24·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,06124·13·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24.2 min6850-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age51.3 years100·95·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$73026·22·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$149,30062·37·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$55,360—28—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,7519647+2.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,17854·33·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.215%100100+3.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.66265+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.1%9151-1.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99892·89·+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.4760·62·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.25340·52·-0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30%5727-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity41.6%1116+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,587———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0118·14·-1.1
Owner-occupied housing units3,757———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,420———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return232·47·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,498———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,5146433+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$33,35400-2.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$478,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population14,345———BEA Regional Accounts
Population14,311———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over12,084———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over11,564———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over10,927———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,888———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,401———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,733———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,999———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,553———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago12,505———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,502———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census14,115———
Poverty rate11.7%9864-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15%6839-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3379885-2.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,988———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,540———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,172———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,872———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,013———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,343———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,161———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population48.1%35·29·-0.5
Preventable hospital stays2,7565049-0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate56019·46·-0.8
Private job growth1.2442·43·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,956———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02519281+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13%22·52·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents25.98·6·-1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200059.970·54·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200459.148·43·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200858.254·50·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201262.650·51·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.880·76·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.488·83·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.588·83·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.674·90·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0.911%6·6·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.8%0·26·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12%52·31·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.01%88·85·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.9%48·57·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%8444-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.3%100·93·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic4.01%54·49·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced17.8%96·99·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.7%36·45·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%92·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.6%42·32·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46.8%14·21·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.2%50·72·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.5%86·89·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.73%94·93·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher13.7%2410-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.8%3420+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.35484·73·+1.1
Stroke3.4%5230-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.4%75·80·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,490———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,396———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.9%9250-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population14,252———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0152525-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed238———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.5%107+0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.9%70·73·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,210———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%8452-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,096———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,140———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,7408865-1.2County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.