placestats

Mono County, CA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,169
Density1.7people per km² of land
Median household income$86,953
Land area7897km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Mono County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Lincoln County, WY, McKenzie County, ND, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK, Juab County, UT, Bottineau County, ND, Foster County, ND, McLean County, ND, Hartley County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Mono Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Fine particulate matter39.10th pct0th pct +14.0 sd
High school graduation0.486%0th pct0th pct -6.2 sd
Life expectancy93.6 years100th pct100th pct +4.1 sd
Median property tax bill3,936100th pct by value93rd pct by value +3.5 sd
Education score-2.010th pct by value1st pct by value -3.1 sd
Vacancy rate59.5%96th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4351261-1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.6%6474-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work110,350 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.483%1210+1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12%5673-0.0CDC PLACES
Any disability28.5%4674-0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.9660·69·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.4%9895-1.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2221525-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19%6228-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.3
Business closing rate13.492·97·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments517———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed71———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened45———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.4924·35·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%7860-0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.7536·52·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.7%6086-0.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,479———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,479———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.6%9078+1.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%8490-1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.8%4271+0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56%3836-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people11.48·18·-1.3
Coronary heart disease5.2%6482-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.9%8082-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking11.6%8492-1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.1%6682+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying8.8988·94·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression23.4%2255+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.9%5286-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.64250·76·+0.1
Economic connectedness0.9643179-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.744336-1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.7962·90·+0.1
Education score-2.010·1·-3.1
Effective property tax rate0.76558·45·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed8,130———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents2.116·2·-1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health18.8%1860+0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter39.100+14.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%6044+0.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.9%1565+0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population2,151———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.9%1263+1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.6%3870+0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.128210+2.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10839·35·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4492446+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,493,300k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score1.2994·99·+2.1
Hearing disability5.9%9886-1.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure27.8%8293-0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.3%3474+0.3CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.486%00-6.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate69.2%16·27·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.7%1252+1.4CDC PLACES
Housing units13,632———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate48128·11·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-6,08828·14·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.7%3272+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths70.69886-1.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,90251·46·-0.2
Jail population rate32841·36·-0.2
Labour force8,459———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.1%2361+0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.9%836+1.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.07019398+1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy93.6 years100100+4.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.8%038+2.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents0.288·2·-0.8
Mammography in the past two years76.6%8277+1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.68529·76·-0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$88,2895085-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$77,97468·87·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$84,06386·94·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work17.5 min7889-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.3 years34·39·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,59396·95·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$514,30090·97·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$86,953—90—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$82,9736688+0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill3,936100·93·+3.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0698%3145-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations3.85107-1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%2872+0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99349·48·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-4.914·4·-1.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.9312·3·-1.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity20.8%7289-0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity30.9%8491-0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,521———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents5.2166·86·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units3,819———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return11,070———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return214·8·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,365———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$49,2718694+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$69,4313884-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$916,970k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,207———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,066———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,147———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over10,809———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,650———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,164———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,441———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,013———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,056———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,987———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,580———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher3,312———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,195———
Poverty rate uncertain11%2469+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain7.8%9094-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2119099-1.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,371———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,330———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,571———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,181———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,276———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,738———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,064———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population63.3%43·48·+0.2
Preventable hospital stays1,5757290-0.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1533·2·-0.8
Private job growth4.6774·84·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs6,590———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03347893+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12.5%96·48·+2.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents16.40·1·-1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.216·41·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200449.911·19·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200843.213·15·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201245.511·16·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201643.27·10·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202038.57·7·-2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202439.49·6·-2.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-16.82·1·-2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions7.72%90·91·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.61%54·12·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22%52·82·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation7.24%96·98·+2.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.2%34·11·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%2467+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over16.4%28·21·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain2.21%92·79·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain6.81%8·2·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born16.3%94·94·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race26.7%89·88·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.9%44·48·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%93·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married34%96·79·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.4%30·70·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.58%50·60·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic65.5%18·29·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.74%16·3·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher34.3%8686+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.1%5283-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.3228·29·-1.5
Stroke2.7%6084-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication50.8%30·4·-1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,350———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,156———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.8%3983-0.1CDC PLACES
Total population13,169———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.027683+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed329———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.9%2033+0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate59.5%96·100·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units8,111———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%2264+0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 503,093———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute6,305———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain4,7399498-1.3County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.