placestats

Golden Valley County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population840
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$57,353
Land area3042km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Golden Valley County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Kiowa County, CO, Phillips County, MT, Meagher County, MT, Custer County, ID, Haakon County, SD, Daniels County, MT, Sioux County, NE, Daggett County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Golden Valley Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1736.1%0th pct4th pct +3.4 sd
Mean travel time to work34 min2nd pct5th pct +2.9 sd
Median household income (model-based)$47,9274th pct10th pct -1.5 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$45,4292nd pct2nd pct -1.4 sd
Arthritis25.9%14th pct30th pct +1.4 sd
Health score-1.0810th pct by value4th pct by value -1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4662277-0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.9%2635+0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain11,705 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.4%5870-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability33%2242+0.6CDC PLACES
Arthritis25.9%1430+1.4CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.1543334-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.2%3612+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate028·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments7———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate024·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%5032+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.138·37·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain36.1%04+3.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort210———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening77.9%162-1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.5%1634+1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.6%1634+0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.7%3619-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people60.876·98·+0.6
Coronary heart disease6%2442+0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.9%188+1.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.4%1634+0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year56%2036-0.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.5549·46·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression26.5%1224+1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.5%5274-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.24416·36·-0.7
Economy score0.2628·20·-1.4
Education score-1.16—5·—
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.50927·16·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed434———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents16.660·43·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health20.9%2442+0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter56496-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.22%435-0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.2%2946+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.4%1017+1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.1%1425+1.0CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4543641+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$36,802k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.0810·4·-1.4
Hearing disability8%2613+0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.9%4067+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.9%8896-1.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.7%82·84·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.5%3254+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units473———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability9.7%1431+1.0CDC PLACES
Labour force445———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.8%2934+0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.5%2753+0.4CDC PLACES
Loneliness32.9%2465+0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.2536·31·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years71.7%5233+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.31416·25·-1.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$45,42922-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$49,19043·38·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work34 min25+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age54.8 years88·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$76951·31·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$203,90065·63·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,353—33—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$47,927410-1.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,03827·27·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0605-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.2%2850+0.4CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate064·35·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity24.3%4267+0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity32.8%8086-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units362———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents042·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units292———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return870———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return254·59·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move703———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,5234849-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$58,8824465-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$51,051k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population867———BEA Regional Accounts
Population835———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over734———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over693———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over670———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over237———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain151———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain134———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined840———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined817———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago779———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain127———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census823———
Poverty rate uncertain18%1025+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain16.4%2430+0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain6621014+1.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 2000531———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004522———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008492———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012479———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016474———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020503———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024515———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth9.6890·96·+0.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs136———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps12.5%74·48·+0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents2612·6·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200082.268·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200476.940·90·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200873.445·87·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.134·85·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201683.745·89·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202084.149·90·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202486.857·93·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20244.6347·33·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%58·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%30·1·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.2%44·83·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%70·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.3%14·5·-1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%1434+0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over28.2%72·94·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%89·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain16.6%93·97·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.7%76·94·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain21.4%35·8·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.3%32·70·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%81·11·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic88.9%54·69·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.68%28·45·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain19%1635-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.1%4877-0.1CDC PLACES
Stroke3.3%2035+0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.7%42·13·-0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed450———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken941———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.1%2947+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population840———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0421—2—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed11———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6686-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain23.5%32·79·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain111———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.3%2241+0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain122———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute344———Census ACS 5-year

19of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.