placestats

Lincoln County, ID

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5276
Density1.7people per km² of land
Median household income$66,038
Land area3112km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lincoln County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Platte County, WY, Custer County, NE, Caribou County, ID, Holt County, NE, Fremont County, WY, Fisher County, TX, Butte County, SD, Benson County, ND. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lincoln Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mutual-friend share0.9820th pct by value17th pct by value -4.2 sd
Mean travel time to work34.9 min0th pct4th pct +3.4 sd
Mammography in the past two years60.5%0th pct0th pct -3.0 sd
Hearing disability9.2%2nd pct3rd pct +2.9 sd
Share foreign-born15%96th pct by value93rd pct by value +2.9 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.8%2nd pct13th pct +2.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.492884-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance17.7%88+1.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work84,115 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.467%3510+0.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.8%213+2.7CDC PLACES
Any disability36.8%422+2.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.8788·67·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.3%3866+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.196928-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.6%10079-1.8CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain60.320·61·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents0100·45·—
Business closing rate14.196·98·+2.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments93———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate16.398·98·+2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.6%9275-1.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.4716·34·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.7%4261-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.161%46·16·-0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort862———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income862———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening77.4%22-2.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.5%2657+0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.3%026+2.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.2%108-1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people25.416·61·-0.9
Coronary heart disease6%1442+0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%2856+0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%6672-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.3%2246-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.4158·42·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression22%5070-0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%1855+0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.614·24·-2.0
Economic connectedness0.672221-2.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4770·31·-1.5
Education score0.94372·93·+0.8
Effective property tax rate0.4792·13·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,588———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents7.9414·15·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health21.6%1037+1.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.22879+0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.31%4017-0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity18.4%332+1.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population794———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.3%5274+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.7%431+1.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03263774+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1014·23·-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3889897-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$329,240k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.068644·57·+0.0
Hearing disability9.2%23+2.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.8%5478-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.9%6088-0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.9%44·65·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15%630+2.2CDC PLACES
Housing units1,973———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,35150·68·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.2%840+1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain97.46049-0.4County Health Rankings
Labour force2,687———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.8%334+1.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23%1658+0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.07048898+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.5 years6275+0.3County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.2%1373+1.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.0312·29·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years60.5%00-3.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.56749·69·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,758824-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$54,17138·48·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,82022·33·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work34.9 min04+3.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age37.2 years4·17·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$86081·53·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$206,70074·64·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$66,038—58—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$65,5116257+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill9918·25·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.124%8091+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations085-1.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.9%431+1.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.9820·17·-4.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.1772·73·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.4692·85·+1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.5%2242+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity34.2%7880-0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,836———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents1794·97·+0.7
Owner-occupied housing units1,412———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,680———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return292·96·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,047———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,597222-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$47,884226-1.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$260,680k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,444———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,450———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,130———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,062———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,501———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over817———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line487———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line653———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,205———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,397———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,615———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher407———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,127———
Poverty rate9.36%6981-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.1%5061-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3158690-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,574———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,875———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,870———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,662———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,748———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,940———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,917———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,1049497-1.5County Health Rankings
Private job growth4.7984·84·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,269———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01631041-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12%91·45·+1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents33.410·18·-1.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200070.640·84·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.952·87·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200869.352·78·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201270.942·73·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201676.736·69·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207840·73·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.940·71·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20248.3154·45·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.81%20·17·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.7%86·58·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains11.8%2·30·-2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.52%98·89·+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.8%24·14·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4%1037+1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over15.5%6·15·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.2%66·56·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born15%96·93·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race32%96·90·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.5%38·42·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.3%46·16·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.4%66·90·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.82%27·36·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.48%—38·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic63.3%6·27·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.06%8·14·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher11.6%04-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.4%4881-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.4184·25·-1.8
Stroke3.2%842+1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.1%2·5·-1.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,210———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,910———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9%1348+1.1CDC PLACES
Total population5,276———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.02718191+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed99———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.7%439+1.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain6.94%0·12·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain137———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6%827+1.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,178———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain71———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,408———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,3217881-0.6County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.