placestats

Lamar County, AL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,809
Density8.8people per km² of land
Median household income$47,447
Land area1567km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lamar County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Van Buren County, AR, Dixie County, FL, Izard County, AR, Jasper County, MS, Wilcox County, GA, Calhoun County, FL, Pickens County, AL, Attala County, MS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lamar Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people60.8100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.8 sd
High cholesterol36.9%0th pct1st pct +2.5 sd
Median gross rent$5480th pct by value3rd pct by value -2.1 sd
Median property tax bill2452nd pct by value1st pct by value -2.0 sd
Effective property tax rate0.2170th pct by value0th pct by value -1.8 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.198th pct by value92nd pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4299257+1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.5%8439-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work119,570 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over21.7%6017-0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability39.1%5111+0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.578·22·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28.1%229+0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.3523412-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.8%3577+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents6.4876·91·+0.1
Black-white residential segregation20.518·5·-0.9County Health Rankings
Business closing rate7.9142·36·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments229———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.2362·47·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%2544+1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents020·6·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain23%9426-1.3Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.215%12·44·-1.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,227———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,227———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.6%4327-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.8%5513-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.5%5716-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.4%8457+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people60.8100·98·+2.8
Coronary heart disease6.9%5312-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%7656-0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.5%5916-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.3%8629+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.0712·31·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression26.5%4124+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.9%6120-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.93969·15·+0.4
Economic connectedness0.728030+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.465175-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.027440·10·-0.1
Education score-0.22541·29·-0.2
Effective property tax rate0.2170·0·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,135———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents58.388·97·+1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health24.8%7819-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.26135+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%8049+0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity21.3%7521-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.4%6317-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.4%7121-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.007758693-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1466·89·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4279471-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$454,390k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.45886·24·+1.1
Hearing disability8.4%208+0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure40.4%459+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol36.9%01+2.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%2640-0.5County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74%44·48·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.1%8929-1.2CDC PLACES
Housing units7,107———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,60455·80·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,70022·30·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability11.2%6713-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths95.98252-0.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,92827·46·-0.4
Jail population rate71972·81·-0.1
Labour force5,290———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.9%8423-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.6%8029-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.05282611-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy72.4 years6421+0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness37.1%4116+0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.8550·36·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years77.1%9081+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.086996·33·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,5197618+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$40,38324·8·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,08452·13·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25.1 min7044-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.5 years70·75·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5480·3·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$112,70048·16·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$47,447—12—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,9297816+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2452·1·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0331%166-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.031026-1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.7%7115-0.6CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain37.2196+1.0County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share1100·100·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.3268·59·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.49920·22·-0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30%9227-1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity40.8%6123-0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,987———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents014·11·-1.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,692———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return296·93·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,815———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,169188-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,158248-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$574,030k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,616———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,661———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,263———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over10,648———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,826———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,063———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,061———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,217———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,685———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,518———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago12,911———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,139———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,972———
Poverty rate15.1%9840-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.4%9630-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6524615-0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20007,249———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,885———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20087,075———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20127,166———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,966———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,193———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,890———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population26.2%27·10·-0.8
Preventable hospital stays2,8127447-0.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate88544·74·-0.3
Private job growth3.3856·72·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,874———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01524033-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps16.5%21·73·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents69.686·88·+0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200062.880·63·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.494·80·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.198·92·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.894·86·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.996·91·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.398·94·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.298·96·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202425.578·93·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.13%22·26·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit23.3%28·83·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains8.33%32·11·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.55%52·42·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.1%49·72·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.7%8219-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.2%64·73·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic9.23%18·67·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.9%28·51·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.85%16·9·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.5%90·96·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.1%24·28·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.2%84·56·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.4%22·22·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic85.9%78·61·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.78%78·93·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher11.6%64-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.5%7631-0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.71622·12·-0.7
Stroke3.8%7115-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.8%39·82·-0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,160———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken24,230———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.5%9130-1.6CDC PLACES
Total population13,809———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01446674+0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed155———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%9672-1.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate29.8%88·89·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,120———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.1%9025-1.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,763———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,766———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,0367229-0.8County Health Rankings

5of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.