placestats

Hickory County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8501
Density8.2people per km² of land
Median household income$35,084
Land area1033km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hickory County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Claiborne County, MS, Amite County, MS, Bienville Parish, LA, Wayne County, MS, Jenkins County, GA, Hancock County, GA, Bullock County, AL, Desha County, AR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hickory Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Lacking social and emotional support21%100th pct84th pct -4.7 sd
Returns reporting capital gains17.8%100th pct by value64th pct by value +4.3 sd
Loneliness33.4%100th pct58th pct -4.0 sd
Social connection score0.251100th pct by value66th pct by value +3.5 sd
Share aged 65 and over32.4%98th pct by value98th pct by value +3.3 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying3.1998th pct by value98th pct by value +3.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4219451+1.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.9%9135-0.9CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work65,150 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over27.8%544-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability43.5%472+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying10.296·94·+2.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis29.5%354+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1869882+2.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.7%064+2.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents010·45·-1.4
Business closing rate12.986·96·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments129———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.3348·33·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%219+2.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.3974·17·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.2%9412-1.7Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,337———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,337———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening78.1%03-2.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease11.1%91+1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability23.6%91+1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.4%7031+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people26.618·64·-0.9
Coronary heart disease7.6%563-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.6%2613+0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking24.6%92+1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year48.4%9611+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.9672·79·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression28.5%79+1.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.9%9520-2.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.8258·3·+0.4
Economic connectedness0.8179853+2.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.26576·4·+0.7
Education score0.72398·85·+1.9
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.47227·12·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,590———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents28.744·69·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health27.4%918-1.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter79863-2.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%2413-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity22%9519-2.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22.1%214+0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17.7%353+0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.00899393-1.8Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1040·27·-2.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4449452-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$215,450k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.70395·13·+1.3
Hearing disability9.6%22+2.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure37.1%10021-2.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.1%7419-0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate84.8%96·96·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity17%9519-2.5CDC PLACES
Housing units5,502———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,40349·72·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,62886·72·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability13.2%633-0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths142187+0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate62.35·0·-0.7
Jail population rate2049·17·-0.5
Labour force2,731———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation12.5%9513-2.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21%10084-4.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy73.1 years9028+1.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.000294—3·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$1k———Census local government finances
Loneliness33.4%10058-4.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.1524·20·-0.5
Mammography in the past two years69.9%2821-0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.55594·18·+2.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$51,675727+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$55,46796·52·+2.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,83996·33·+1.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.5 min3623+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age55.2 years98·98·+2.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$69971·16·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$123,20092·23·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$35,084—3—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$48,2139810+1.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill58155·8·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0654%8439+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.67057+0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability19.2%865-1.1CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain41.8223+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.9882·28·-2.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-4.5516·4·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying3.1998·98·+3.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity36.5%815-1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity43.1%849-0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,457———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents014·11·-0.9
Owner-occupied housing units2,932———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,670———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return252·64·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,433———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$21,208304-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,696449-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$372,100k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,715———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,718———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,302———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,163———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,437———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,756———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,627———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,487———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,337———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,497———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,374———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher772———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,279———
Poverty rate19.5%9619-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)17.5%9624-2.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6049024-1.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,238———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,866———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,115———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,680———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,724———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,080———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,120———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%5·2·-1.6
Preventable hospital stays71010099-2.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,20076·88·+0.6
Private job growth-1.1336·16·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,053———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02449479+1.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps20.7%13·87·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents33.218·17·-1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200052.674·29·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200457.774·38·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200856.872·46·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201262.180·50·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.788·72·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207986·76·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.884·77·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202428.294·96·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.27%14·9·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit18.5%0·67·-2.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.8%100·64·+4.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.28%86·63·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.6%12·54·-1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.4%959-1.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over32.4%98·98·+3.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.5%80·93·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.69%18·7·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.7%30·33·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%8·17·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married51.4%92·43·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.01%—71·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.7%92·90·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.59%64·92·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher12%365-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41%9618-1.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.251100·66·+3.5
Stroke4.1%939-1.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.8%9·74·-2.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,940———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,042———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off13.7%9512-1.8CDC PLACES
Total population8,501———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01076566+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed141———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.2%289+0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate37.2%96·95·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,045———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.2%9513-1.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,282———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,288———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost13,2088219-1.0County Health Rankings

4of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.