placestats

Claiborne County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8908
Density7.1people per km² of land
Median household income$34,371
Land area1262km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Claiborne County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bienville Parish, LA, Amite County, MS, Hickory County, MO, Hancock County, GA, Humphreys County, MS, Lowndes County, AL, Desha County, AR, Bullock County, AL. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Claiborne Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Preventable hospital stays9,0060th pct0th pct +4.6 sd
Median household income (model-based)$28,5790th pct0th pct -2.6 sd
Religious adherents130th pct by value0th pct by value -2.6 sd
Economy score-1.070th pct by value0th pct by value -2.3 sd
Share never married54.4%100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.9 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200417.80th pct by value0th pct by value -1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.31662-1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance14.5%6419-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work64,915 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.278%5255-0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over32.6%241+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability43.6%462+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.0512·12·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis29.3%394+0.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.61543-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking10.7%93100-1.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0.8314·61·-1.3
Black-white residential segregation32.945·17·-0.0County Health Rankings
Business closing rate13.186·96·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments88———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.4610·5·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5%9399-1.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.6736·10·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain41.7%361+0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.475%46·97·-0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,577———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,577———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.8%10081+1.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.2%668-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.1%646-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.8%6226+0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people33.938·79·-0.2
Coronary heart disease7.5%644-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.5%3616+0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking21.1%719-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year6.7%201-1.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.5528·46·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression17.8%9397-1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes19.6%161+1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-2.2141·2·-0.2
Economic connectedness0.432111-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-1.070·0·-2.3
Education score-0.45856·19·+0.3
Effective property tax rate0.58246·24·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,555———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.152·16·-1.6
Fair or poor self-rated health32.2%412+0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.16637-0.1County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain38.1482-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%8844+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity39.9%241+0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.8%7526-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16.4%8010-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.09771124+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.19292·100·+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.531163+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$938,520k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.627·1·-1.5
Hearing disability6.7%9857-1.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure51.4%110+1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.1%7319-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%8975+0.9County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate75.2%68·55·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Homicide rate uncertain28.7352+0.0County Health Rankings
Housing insecurity30.6%120+1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units3,949———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.02675541-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,22929·63·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$47554·41·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability14.2%361+0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1106531-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate73715·8·-0.6
Jail population rate1684·11·-0.5
Labour force2,753———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation20.8%171+1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support35.8%50+1.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.05272711-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy68.6 years303-0.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness40.9%121+0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.3336·22·-0.5
Mammography in the past two years73%5645+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score-2.7516·1·-1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$42,111181-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$39,19554·6·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$38,72054·6·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.1 min4225+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.8 years2·6·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$65147·10·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$80,80026·2·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$34,371—3—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$28,57900-2.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill47029·4·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0236%262-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations5.683612-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability23.3%251+0.9CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.90842·14·-0.4
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain44.7152+0.8County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share1100·100·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-7.654·2·-1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.4934·6·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity42.1%181+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity50.5%180+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,836———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.0118·14·-0.9
Owner-occupied housing units2,132———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,400———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return216·47·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,626———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$18,61943-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$40,195324-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$338,640k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,425———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,617———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,331———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,742———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,164———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,688———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain2,134———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,470———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,853———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,554———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,247———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,062———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,135———
Poverty rate uncertain27.2%586-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)32.7%201+0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality781445+0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,615———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,321———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,449———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,484———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,272———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,449———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,541———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population80%64·75·+0.7
Preventable hospital stays9,00600+4.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,06168·83·+0.3
Private job growth-0.9240·17·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,154———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01576436+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps29.9%54·98·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents130·0·-2.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200019.42·0·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200417.80·0·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200813.82·0·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201211.42·0·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201612.70·0·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202013.82·0·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202415.90·0·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-3.4914·13·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.15%78·66·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit44.8%92·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains4.45%14·1·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.97%92·74·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year83.4%100·100·+1.2CDC PLACES
Safety score-2.7921·1·-0.6
Self-care disability8%251+0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.9%40·43·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic86.1%100·100·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain8.12%6·6·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.6%82·94·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married54.4%100·100·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married30.8%2·1·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic10.8%2·1·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.66%12·44·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.6%9844+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours45.7%362+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.6612·0·-1.2
Stroke5.7%181+1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication69.7%100·100·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,370———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,920———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off22.9%201+0.9CDC PLACES
Total population8,908———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed198———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate7.2%62+1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate28.2%76·87·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,113———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability10.7%271+0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,424———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,308———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost18,809223+0.8County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.