placestats

Desha County, AR

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,041
Density5.8people per km² of land
Median household income$36,064
Land area1920km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Desha County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Jefferson County, MS, Zapata County, TX, Lee County, AR, Bullock County, AL, Quitman County, GA, Lowndes County, AL, Wilkinson County, MS, Amite County, MS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Desha Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%98th pct71st pct +2.1 sd
Membership organisations17.6100th pct89th pct +1.9 sd
No leisure-time physical activity44.3%6th pct0th pct +1.6 sd
Mean travel time to work18.3 min96th pct87th pct -1.6 sd
Cognitive disability24.1%6th pct0th pct +1.4 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population10.3%17th pct by value4th pct by value -1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.365212-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance16.8%2811+0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work70,125 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over26.8%525-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability45.5%151+0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.1642·35·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28.7%436+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.481576+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12.5%7298-0.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents13.472·98·+0.7
Black-white residential segregation28.344·12·-0.2County Health Rankings
Business closing rate7.2134·23·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments260———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate4.554·3·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.7%4794-0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.9848·13·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain35.6%604-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.552%62·99·+0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort3,109———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income3,109———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.7%3216-0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease10.7%151+0.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability24.1%60+1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening50.9%147-0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people50.988·95·+1.2
Coronary heart disease8.1%151+0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.9%118+0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking23%344+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year39.9%323+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.5448·72·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression24.5%2844+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes17.1%492-0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-2.5219·1·-0.7
Economic connectedness0.566638+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.5545911+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.10682·7·+0.9
Education score-0.2167·30·+0.5
Effective property tax rate0.5847·24·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,014———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents44.282·88·+0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health34.8%151+1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.53524+0.4County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain32.2686-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%9871+2.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity36.6%291+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22.7%153+1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress18.9%91+1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06036153+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.15550·96·+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4836016-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$727,180k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.1140·4·-0.0
Hearing disability8.1%3211+0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure46.7%431+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.6%3812+0.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%8375+0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate60.5%12·7·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity27.4%361+0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units5,812———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.02466649-0.5Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-27048·37·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability15%191+0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths98.57947-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,00064·79·-0.2
Jail population rate55657·66·-0.4
Labour force4,227———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation18.2%362+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support33.6%412+0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.04882013-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy70.6 years429+0.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness39.1%606-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents774·55·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years69.4%2018-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-2.0450·2·-0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$53,055749+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$37,69940·4·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,97040·5·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.3 min9687-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.2 years50·47·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$68961·15·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$89,10058·5·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$36,064—3—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$43,469724+0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill51741·5·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0289%364-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.610089+1.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability22.8%261+0.7CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.47866·30·+0.4
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain32.75910-0.3County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99970·97·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.6634·9·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.3834·7·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity44.3%60+1.6CDC PLACES
Obesity46.6%432+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,750———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents1.1246·34·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,874———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,370———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return228·53·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,416———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$22,848486+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$51,9409442+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$544,230k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,478———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,479———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,747———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,909———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,503———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,169———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line3,164———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,598———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,941———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,392———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,861———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher978———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,395———
Poverty rate28.9%325+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)25%645-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality720488-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,495———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,647———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,678———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,420———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,257———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,164———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,505———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population10.3%17·4·-1.3
Preventable hospital stays5,233103+1.1County Health Rankings
Private job growth2.2266·58·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,545———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01777249+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps29.1%52·98·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents66.786·85·+1.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200036.635·4·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200437.833·4·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200843.847·16·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201243.747·14·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201646.348·13·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202048.848·16·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202452.445·17·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202415.867·74·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.66%66·58·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit30%32·94·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains6.87%40·5·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.83%64·51·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.8%47·90·+0.1CDC PLACES
Safety score-1.7848·5·+0.4
Self-care disability7.5%301+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over19.6%50·49·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic48.6%42·96·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.8%54·49·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.93%76·58·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.3%52·66·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married35.3%42·82·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married43.8%62·13·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain54.4%21·81·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain4.13%80·98·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic42.8%56·10·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.1%50·88·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher13%487-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours44.3%463+0.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.67676·14·+0.7
Stroke5.2%321+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication64%34·95·-0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,370———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken25,366———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off21.7%291+0.7CDC PLACES
Total population11,041———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.01575324-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed213———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5%3411+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18.3%20·64·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,062———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability10.3%282+0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,332———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,830———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost15,390569-0.1County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.