placestats

Grant County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population695
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$69,063
Land area2012km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Grant County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cheyenne County, CO, Wayne County, UT, Banner County, NE, Arthur County, NE, Kent County, TX, Roberts County, TX, White Pine County, NV, Haines Borough, AK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Grant Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people115100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.1 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths1%0th pct0th pct +2.4 sd
Returns reporting capital gains39.3%96th pct by value100th pct by value +1.7 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.148%95th pct96th pct +1.7 sd
Share divorced16.3%93rd pct by value96th pct by value +1.4 sd
Cognitive disability12.3%90th pct96th pct -1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5637497+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain7.8%9285-1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain7,255 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths1%00+2.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7.8%9095-1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability25.5%9292-1.2CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.8%7285-0.7CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.8%84+1.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate022·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate024·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2211+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents21.690·84·+0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.6%7067-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort113———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income113———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82%5434+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.5%7282-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.3%9096-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.8%7043+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people115100·100·+3.1
Coronary heart disease5.2%6682-0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%8894-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.8%6678-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year67.4%9090+1.1CDC PLACES
Depression18.7%8894-1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.8%6688-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.99790·91·+0.9
Economy score0.86130·53·-0.4
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.74954·43·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed293———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents37.190·81·+1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health14.2%9095-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.16295-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%304-0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.5%9094-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15%9096-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11%9094-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.09948·20·-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4442853+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$38,281k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.76512·11·-1.0
Hearing disability6.7%6857-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.5%5881-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.2%7894-0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate68.5%22·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.5%9798-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units418———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.7%8692-0.9CDC PLACES
Labour force299———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.2%9095-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.2%8193-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.103—100—Stanford Education Data Archive
Loneliness29.7%9096-1.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents7.0348·55·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years72.9%5844+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.66658·74·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,0323037-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain24.6 min848+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age37.8 years14·20·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$88349·57·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$113,90017·17·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$69,063—65—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$63,6074652-0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain85313·19·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.148%9596+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0545-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.2%8490-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99532·58·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate060·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23.5%4274+0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity36.6%3064+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units295———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.3360·22·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units202———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return580———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return284·92·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move552———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,4493654-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$60,3354068-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$34,210k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population567———BEA Regional Accounts
Population565———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over560———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over427———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over476———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over143———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line58———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined685———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined563———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago599———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain140———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census611———
Poverty rate (model-based)10.3%8077-0.7Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000385———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004396———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008367———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012363———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016405———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020402———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024366———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth3.4880·74·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs208———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0135822-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain7.5%23·9·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents66.180·84·+0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200086.991·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200489.696·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200888.691·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201291.596·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201694.896·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202094.996·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202495.993·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.0462·48·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%48·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%24·1·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains39.3%96·100·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.8%80·28·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.8%8490-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.6%30·59·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain16.3%93·96·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.2%30·28·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.1%42·11·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.8%34·78·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%86·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.5%98·94·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher29.4%8077+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.4%9496-1.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.067132·54·-0.4
Stroke2.7%7284-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.2%84·48·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed280———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,267———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6%9493-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population695———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed6———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2%8895-0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain29.4%67·89·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain123———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%8491-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain130———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute295———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.