placestats

Grand County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9697
Density1.0people per km² of land
Median household income$62,521
Land area9513km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Grand County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Gove County, KS, Hamilton County, KS, Roger Mills County, OK, Powell County, MT, McIntosh County, ND, Beaver County, OK, Wells County, ND, Lyman County, SD. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Grand Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202445.10th pct by value11th pct by value -5.6 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202044.50th pct by value12th pct by value -5.2 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201650.20th pct by value16th pct by value -4.6 sd
Median home value$480,900100th pct by value96th pct by value +4.2 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-160th pct by value2nd pct by value -4.1 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation6.73%100th pct by value98th pct by value +3.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4642277-0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.4%5850-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work69,400 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.2%5380-0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.6%9089-1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability30.4%5460-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.4696·85·+1.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.2%3252+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1293238-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13%10097-2.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate9.2858·67·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments489———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed45———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened53———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.976·74·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%46+1.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.864·21·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.1%6864-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.292%91·75·+1.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,138———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,138———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%4214-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.6%8880-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16%3854+0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.4%8448+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people21.74·51·-1.4
Coronary heart disease5.4%7473-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%2634+0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking10.4%10096-3.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.8%8881+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying9.09100·95·+3.1IRS county migration flows
Depression26.4%424+1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%6078-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.32656·60·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.9224173-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.642020-2.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.3878·78·+0.9
Education score-0.56835·16·-0.5
Effective property tax rate0.4186·7·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,578———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.0210·10·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health17.5%6872-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.28594-0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.46%9867+1.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.7%5667-0.2CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain707———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.7%4467+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%5261-0.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.11217+2.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10510·28·-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.481818+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$927,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.68298·89·+2.1
Hearing disability7.4%3628+0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.8%8687-0.9CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.3%8694-1.0CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.725%—3—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate69.8%12·29·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.9%5975-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units5,333———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,05215·53·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,37071·77·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.8%7070-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1313812+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,11491·72·+0.3
Jail population rate59265·70·-0.1
Labour force6,833———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%5967-0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.2%10098-2.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.035—86—Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy80.3 years8694+1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.5%4781+0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.4626·51·-0.8
Mammography in the past two years62.7%21-2.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.29131·52·-0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$72,3496561+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$65,87485·75·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$56,50568·62·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.1 min6995-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.6 years8·32·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$1,02198·75·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$480,900100·96·+4.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$62,521—48—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,3608463+0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,01288·67·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.163%9498+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations5.121610-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%6672-0.6CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain23.5—29—County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99540·62·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.6560·65·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.62635·19·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity19.2%9494-1.7CDC PLACES
Obesity28.2%9896-2.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,466———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents26.696·98·+3.0
Owner-occupied housing units3,116———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,920———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return20·2·-3.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,502———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$41,4438883+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$76,9787090+0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$755,150k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,810———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,706———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,169———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,722———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,896———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,960———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,632———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,018———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,605———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,604———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,349———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,395———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,669———
Poverty rate uncertain17%930+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.6%8674-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3448084-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,614———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,165———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,077———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,950———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,533———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,185———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,300———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population38.9%14·19·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays9499098-1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate57553·48·-0.4
Private job growth0.10427·27·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs5,793———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02443879-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8%25·12·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents4124·34·-0.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200061.10·58·-2.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200453.40·27·-2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200847.52·23·-2.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201253.60·30·-2.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201650.20·16·-4.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202044.50·12·-5.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202445.10·11·-5.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-160·2·-4.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions5.61%96·80·+2.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.2%48·28·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.4%24·72·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation6.73%100·98·+3.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year69.7%28·9·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%6667-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.2%10·56·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain3.94%—86·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced16.6%96·97·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain7.29%70·76·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race12.5%65·75·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.1%26·28·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.5%94·64·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46.8%6·21·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%61·11·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic78.7%22·46·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.06%8·31·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher34.7%9886+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.7%1857+0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.28828·68·-0.8
Stroke2.9%6467-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.5%14·7·-1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,350———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,006———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.8%5365-0.2CDC PLACES
Total population9,697———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.02436989+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed255———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.7%1639+0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain16.3%24·56·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain867———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%4858-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,148———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,592———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,3579581-1.1County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.