placestats

Duchesne County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population19,932
Density2.4people per km² of land
Median household income$74,738
Land area8380km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Duchesne County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Ransom County, ND, Brule County, SD, Greenlee County, AZ, Lake County, MN, Thomas County, KS, Custer County, CO, Martin County, TX, Churchill County, NV. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Duchesne Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Other religion adherents51.596th pct by value99th pct by value +3.5 sd
Binge drinking11.9%100th pct99th pct -3.5 sd
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0.472%97th pct by value97th pct by value +3.2 sd
Prison population rate1,05997th pct by value83rd pct by value +2.9 sd
People per tax return2100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.8 sd
Mammography in the past two years61.6%0th pct1st pct -2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5224891+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.4%2640+0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work150,950 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16.3%1243+1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability30.7%2658+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.9160·50·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.5%1048+1.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1781430-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking11.9%10099-3.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 5081.877·89·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate10.788·87·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments528———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed56———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened67———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.894·90·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2811+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.120·15·-1.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.5%4073+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.14%31·9·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort3,070———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income3,070———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening78.4%03-2.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.5%1457+0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.9%830+1.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.9%1410-1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people20.920·48·-0.9
Coronary heart disease5.9%1047+1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.3%1021+1.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking11.8%9491-1.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.4%4674+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.4844·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression26%628+1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%1859+0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.029312·44·-1.0
Drug overdose deaths uncertain30.1—50—County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.9383075-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.098088+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0110·61·-0.8
Education score-0.029533·40·-0.4
Effective property tax rate0.63528·31·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed8,606———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents5.466·9·-1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health19.5%2253+0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.61349+0.8County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain23.1—21—County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised115—54·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate22.5—95·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.24%207-1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.5%2352+1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population636———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.1%639+1.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.4%836+1.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06441650+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1128·40·-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4255274-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,765,300k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.14118·42·-0.9
Hearing disability7.8%617+1.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.6%4680+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol26.9%9699-1.7CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.86%1429-1.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate79.3%56·78·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12%2761+0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units8,943———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,46093·74·+1.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$8,91166·76·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.9%646+1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1211320+1.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,65880·65·+0.3
Jail population rate99195·90·+1.9
Labour force8,858———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.5%2053+0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.6%5777-0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.7 years1855-0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.4%3783+0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents00·1·-1.1
Mammography in the past two years61.6%01-2.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.50612·65·-0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$80,6345875-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,84048·56·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,92916·34·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.5 min4876-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.8 years4·6·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$93474·65·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$253,60074·76·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,738—78—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$75,7057880+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,61144·54·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0709%4247-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations2.9865-1.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.5%2259+0.5CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain20—43—County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99668·65·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.174·72·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.42774·60·+0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.8%4672-0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity31.6%8889-1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,714———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents51.596·99·+3.5
Owner-occupied housing units5,324———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return19,160———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return2100·100·+2.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move16,623———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,966834-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$52,559644-1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,079,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population20,541———BEA Regional Accounts
Population20,477———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)17,932———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over14,574———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over14,005———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over11,899———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,543———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,605———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,513———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined19,588———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined20,266———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago17,276———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,023———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census19,596———
Poverty rate13.3%1051+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.4%1259+1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4612055+0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,546———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,556———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,744———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,379———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,942———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20208,561———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20248,968———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population30.2%15·12·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays2,0525377-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,05997·83·+2.9
Private job growth7.7498·94·+1.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs6,233———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01281018-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.5%77·24·+0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.148·72·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200082.396·98·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200486.598·99·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200883.7100·98·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201290.7100·100·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201691.7100·99·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.998·98·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.690·96·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.2738·38·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions7.08%96·89·+1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.5%88·45·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.4%8·34·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.68%56·47·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.3%22·11·-0.7CDC PLACES
Safety score-0.487—35·—
Self-care disability3.7%1248+0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over12.8%4·5·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic3.49%—85·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.3%33·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born3.19%51·45·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race7.1%62·59·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.7%26·33·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0.472%97·97·+3.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.9%42·19·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.8%70·95·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain30.4%—36·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm61.4%—48·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.91%36·38·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain0.727%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic85.3%38·59·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed5.02%15·13·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17%1224-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32%5489-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.074718·45·-1.1
Stroke3.2%842+1.3CDC PLACES
Suicide rate uncertain38.8—2—County Health Rankings
Taking blood pressure medication50.2%4·2·-1.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed8,330———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken40,917———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.5%2355+0.9CDC PLACES
Total population19,932———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01178268+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed252———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%3876-0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate24.9%80·82·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,229———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.2%1643+0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 504,547———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year372———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute7,371———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,4993156+0.4County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.