placestats

Thomas County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7913
Density2.8people per km² of land
Median household income$73,575
Land area2783km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Thomas County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Fremont County, ID, Custer County, CO, Ransom County, ND, Brule County, SD, Meade County, SD, Boone County, NE, Duchesne County, UT, Roseau County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Thomas Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mean travel time to work11.4 min100th pct99th pct -2.4 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.944th pct by value1st pct by value -2.3 sd
Economic connectedness in high school1.1495th pct92nd pct +1.9 sd
Preventable hospital stays4,5006th pct6th pct +1.9 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%6th pct4th pct -1.7 sd
Received food stamps6.1%3rd pct by value2nd pct by value -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5265892+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.6%6874-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work43,740 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.333%5632-0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.9%3260+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability27.7%6680-0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.6214·7·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.9%4472+0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1081742-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.1%7441-0.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate5.728·7·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments299———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.0726·16·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3832+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents15.160·71·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain8.7%9893-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort897———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income897———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.3%9058+1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%5477-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.1%6880-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.6%4641-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people2950·69·-0.2
Coronary heart disease5.2%8282-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%7278-0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.9%7677-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.1%7082+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.5674·72·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression21.6%6875-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9%7284-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.78878·83·+0.7
Economic connectedness14884+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.149592+1.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.2246·71·-0.1
Education score-0.062528·38·-0.6
Effective property tax rate1.3286·81·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,311———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents16.966·44·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health15.7%7288-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.95284-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%64-1.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.9%8992-1.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain343———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.2%4876+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.5%8089-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01954082-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11336·47·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4552040+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$910,350k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.17712·40·-1.2
Hearing disability6.6%7262-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.1%4075+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.4%2873+0.3CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.9%3356-0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate76.5%26·62·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.2%4984-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units3,580———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate86563·38·+0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-12,5886·5·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.1%7486-0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain954454+0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,51669·62·+0.2
Jail population rate46369·57·+0.1
Labour force4,399———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.5%8692-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.2%9793-1.3CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.7 years5277+0.0County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.000451—5·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$2k———Census local government finances
Loneliness30.1%8394-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents19.754·91·+0.0
Mammography in the past two years72.8%4043-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.85565·85·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$75,8954867-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,61214·23·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$59,20074·69·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work11.4 min10099-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age35.3 years10·9·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$75342·27·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$165,90048·47·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$73,575—76—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,7744068-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,19282·71·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0876%6269+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations197292+0.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.1%4880-0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99562·60·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.3552·60·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.944·1·-2.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.4%4467+0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity36.5%5065+0.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,101———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents474·80·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units2,373———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,880———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·41·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,265———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,6377078+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$61,0593870-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$479,800k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,858———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,865———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,305———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,942———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,936———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,415———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain516———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line699———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,488———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,436———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,535———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,493———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,930———
Poverty rate uncertain6.89%9495-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.4%7884-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3914073+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,780———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,870———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,673———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,474———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,576———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,810———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,664———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population39.1%34·19·-0.4
Preventable hospital stays4,50066+1.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate40362·27·+0.1
Private job growth4.2788·81·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,373———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02273674-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain6.1%3·2·-1.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents55.840·69·-0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200077.880·94·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200478.772·92·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200878.378·94·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201282.378·94·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20168680·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202083.470·88·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.470·85·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.6730·36·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.55%72·57·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.2%52·22·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.7%58·84·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%20·9·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%86·36·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.9%8287-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over17.9%26·32·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain8.52%20·8·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain4.33%68·57·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.08%65·63·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago82.6%6·9·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.9%90·66·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.4%24·71·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90.1%54·74·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.15%15·15·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher30.2%9078+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%2064+1.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.1478·96·+0.6
Stroke2.7%7684-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.8%94·59·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,660———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,448———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.6%2668+0.3CDC PLACES
Total population7,913———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01843619-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed88———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2%7895-0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.4%36·43·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain479———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%8891-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,797———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,822———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,6793866+0.2County Health Rankings

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.