placestats

Wilson County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8559
Density5.8people per km² of land
Median household income$57,056
Land area1477km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wilson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Decatur County, IA, Coosa County, AL, Ashland County, WI, Burt County, NE, Uvalde County, TX, Rolette County, ND, Bollinger County, MO, Rusk County, WI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wilson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership of volunteering groups0.184%98th pct99th pct +2.5 sd
Trend in average test score-0.04880th pct1st pct -2.1 sd
Business closing rate14.496th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd
Education score-1.145th pct by value5th pct by value -2.0 sd
Jail population rate1,26892nd pct by value94th pct by value +1.6 sd
Motor vehicle crash deaths39.911th pct4th pct +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4414665-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.1%5153-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work70,110 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.8%2829+0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability32.9%4943-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.4844·42·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.1%4140+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.07037349+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.1%7158-0.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents066·45·-0.4
Business closing rate14.496·98·+2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments191———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed28———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.370·65·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%4344+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.0524·32·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.3%6648-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.247%63·58·+0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,623———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,623———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.6%3315-0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.6%3532+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.3%5137+0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.3%6439+0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.970·82·+0.7
Coronary heart disease6.2%3934+0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%4951-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.4%2025+0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.7%7060+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.5588·72·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression23%5559-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%5555-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.090751·41·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.7794543-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7726340+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.45834·30·-0.1
Education score-1.145·5·-2.0
Effective property tax rate1.3872·83·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,793———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents25.570·63·+0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health19.9%6350-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.9614+0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%5627-0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.2%5354-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain136———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.8%5345+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.5%7653-0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0355972-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13468·84·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4464649+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$409,850k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.26843·34·-0.1
Hearing disability7.6%2221+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33%4147-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.3%3547+0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.3%38·50·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.8%4750-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units4,492———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.01986568-0.5Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,48372·75·+0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$87942·42·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.1%5742-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths138109+1.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,47394·83·-0.0
Jail population rate1,26892·94·+1.6
Labour force3,917———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.4%5655-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22%5870-0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.05081112-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.4 years3631-0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.8%7578-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents8.2664·63·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years68.9%2616-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.17658·46·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,8082018-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,27914·16·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,40012·18·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.1 min8084-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.3 years42·58·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72746·22·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$93,90012·6·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,056—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,1642424-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,29436·38·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.184%9899+2.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.69091+1.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.8%4742-0.3CDC PLACES
Mobility score0.36470·77·+0.6
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain39.9114+1.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99892·88·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-4.18·5·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.0616·11·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity28%5339-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity39.9%4732+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,515———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.7960·50·-0.1
Owner-occupied housing units2,610———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,110———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·64·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,310———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,7716645+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$51,9854642-0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$438,650k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,438———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,382———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,882———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,388———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,942———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,929———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,331———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,179———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,429———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,245———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,751———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,263———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,624———
Poverty rate15.8%3236+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.3%5643-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5972625+0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,095———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,398———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,121———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,717———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,591———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,954———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,603———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population44.6%26·25·-0.5
Preventable hospital stays2,7343651+0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2156·7·-1.1
Private job growth1.5569·48·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,428———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02065066-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.6%8·25·-1.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents39.640·31·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.986·82·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200475.596·87·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200870.986·82·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201277.594·88·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.488·86·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.388·83·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.782·80·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.954·60·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.19%48·28·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit18.1%64·65·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains15.9%48·53·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.1%12·25·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.7%43·34·+0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%5344-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.5%54·75·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain0.584%—65·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.4%66·73·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.59%31·17·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.62%56·34·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.6%72·79·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22%16·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.5%76·71·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.43%84·79·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91%60·77·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.14%88·88·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.3%7448+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.1%5861-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.90892·92·+1.4
Stroke3.2%5142-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.6%88·71·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,650———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,133———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.9%2836+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population8,559———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.048801-2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed124———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%6659-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate21.8%62·75·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units977———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%5752-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,609———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,668———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost11,6584933+0.2County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.