placestats

Dade County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7627
Density6.0people per km² of land
Median household income$49,899
Land area1269km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Dade County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Forest County, PA, Nolan County, TX, Douglas County, MO, McCurtain County, OK, Oscoda County, MI, Johnston County, OK, Perry County, MS, Pike County, AR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Dade Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Returns reporting capital gains20.9%98th pct by value78th pct by value +2.5 sd
Learning rate0.039991st pct89th pct +1.7 sd
Lacking social and emotional support20.3%100th pct93rd pct -1.7 sd
Children in single-parent households0.136%2nd pct by value7th pct by value -1.6 sd
Preventable hospital stays1,53196th pct91st pct -1.5 sd
Friending clustering0.1056th pct by value30th pct by value -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4398064+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.5%8549-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work70,745 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.8%2211+0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability39.9%318+0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.2962·73·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.4%4014+0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1476735+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.5%2151+0.6CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain85.480·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents048·45·-0.6
Business closing rate6.0810·9·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments132———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.8418·13·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%819+0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.6528·10·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.7%8836-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.136%2·7·-1.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,298———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,298———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.7%178-1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.4%197+0.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.2%196+0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.9%3215-0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people42.380·90·+0.7
Coronary heart disease6.9%3812+0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.2%4025-0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking21.5%237+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year51%4818+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.5532·46·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression27.5%2915+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.8%5632-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.0438·12·-0.3
Economic connectedness0.8429458+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6836626+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.27766·20·+0.5
Education score0.093163·49·+0.2
Effective property tax rate0.6551·32·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,107———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents53.288·95·+1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health23.7%7325-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.75346+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.38%7637+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.5%7837-1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain134———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.7%3813+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16%4014+0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.005078388-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1056·30·-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.464035+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$259,910k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.40781·27·+0.8
Hearing disability8.8%195+0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.3%7331-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.2%6033-0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.4%52·62·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14.5%7134-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units3,790———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$10,85980·81·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability11.2%4213+0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1006445-0.5County Health Rankings
Labour force3,211———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.4%6627-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.3%10093-1.7CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.03999189+1.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.1 years6228+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.2%9073-1.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.5948·34·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years73.8%8252+1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.052486·34·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,9436619+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$48,19756·28·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,33712·4·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24.6 min6448-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.7 years76·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$65026·10·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$157,20094·42·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$49,899—16—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,9598023+0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,02266·27·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.115%7287+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.48277+0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.6%4616-0.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99110·38·+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.7666·47·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.7484·89·+1.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity32.3%6516-0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity40.5%4426+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,038———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents026·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units2,321———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,470———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return254·77·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,689———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,5236827+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$46,5164621+0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$359,050k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,719———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,716———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,358———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,133———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,551———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,865———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,052———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,068———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,454———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,521———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,641———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher844———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,569———
Poverty rate14.1%9446-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.2%9644-1.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5507834-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,752———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,089———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,112———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,896———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,951———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,119———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,186———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,5319691-1.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate3797·23·-1.1
Private job growth0.25538·29·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,181———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02578682+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps15.4%37·67·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.474·73·+0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200067.486·77·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200472.988·83·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200870.876·81·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201275.586·84·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201683.384·88·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202083.980·89·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.870·87·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.442·76·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.23%6·8·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.6%18·57·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20.9%98·78·+2.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.54%32·41·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.8%42·56·-0.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.5%5423-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.5%74·84·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.7%54·77·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.76%30·21·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.12%29·14·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.1%28·37·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.1%24·15·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.4%76·63·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.92%54·69·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.26%33·74·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.8%84·86·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.84%64·85·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.2%3215-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.7%4021+0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.59692·84·+1.0
Stroke3.6%5621-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.9%42·61·-0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,250———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,311———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.3%5124-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population7,627———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01433826-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed104———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%7859-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate19.8%44·70·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units752———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.9%6729-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,347———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain115———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,878———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost11,9866129-0.2County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.