placestats

Perry County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,459
Density6.8people per km² of land
Median household income$50,435
Land area1677km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Perry County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Ritchie County, WV, Craig County, OK, McCurtain County, OK, Pike County, AR, Iron County, MO, Nolan County, TX, Johnston County, OK, Forest County, PA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Perry Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Dental visit in the past year6.9%0th pct1st pct -4.5 sd
Private job growth-9.332nd pct by value2nd pct by value -2.5 sd
Share divorced19%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.3 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.397100th pct93rd pct -2.0 sd
High school graduation0.802%3rd pct11th pct -1.9 sd
Returns reporting capital gains5.59%0th pct by value3rd pct by value -1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4012836-0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12.1%4234-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work112,410 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over24.7%248+0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability38.8%4613+0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.546·61·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.5%3113+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.3172115-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.6%5679-0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents6.3984·91·+1.0
Black-white residential segregation22.917·6·-1.2County Health Rankings
Business closing rate11.580·92·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments120———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.244·31·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.9%5264-0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents018·6·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.3%2012+0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.409%89·93·+1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,456———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,456———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.2%8856+1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.6%5215-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.6%5415-0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.2%128-1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people41.776·89·+0.7
Coronary heart disease6.7%6016-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%9478-1.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20%5414+0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year6.9%01-4.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.3582·84·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression22.2%8567-1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.4%2315+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.93850·15·-0.0
Economic connectedness0.7676941+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.49276-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.17216·6·-1.1
Education score-0.62312·13·-1.0
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.75267·43·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,925———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents4974·92·+0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health24.3%5821-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter9.2210+1.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%8044+0.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity22%4219+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.5%9031-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.1%7925-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.007717587-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13160·80·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.39710093-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$414,560k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.70235·14·-0.3
Hearing disability8%5013-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure41.5%136+1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol35.5%84+1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.802%311-1.9County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate80.1%84·82·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity16.7%4420+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units5,463———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,17336·61·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-5,11110·17·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.8%6517-0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1016144-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,92039·46·-0.4
Jail population rate34131·39·-0.5
Labour force4,081———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation11.9%3716+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support28.8%1010+1.0CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0382923-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy70.4 years128-1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness36.6%2219+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2.8318·18·-0.7
Mammography in the past two years70.1%4422-0.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.2970·26·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$52,224188-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$39,63610·6·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,74756·23·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.6 min3027+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.9 years58·63·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$65024·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$126,00074·25·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$50,435—18—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$46,20167-1.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain94762·23·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0609%3233-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.682040-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17%4214+0.3CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain34.9277+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99996·95·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-3.2816·7·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.8516·14·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity34.7%178+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity43.6%67+1.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,552———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents022·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units3,644———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,210———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return280·91·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,878———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$25,9502613-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$40,720285-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$465,560k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,433———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,315———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,425———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,819———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,859———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,178———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,016———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,199———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,120———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,219———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,451———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher895———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,511———
Poverty rate18.1%5224+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)19.6%3216+0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality737127+1.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,359———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,010———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,640———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,722———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,432———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,916———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,539———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population76%73·67·+0.6
Preventable hospital stays2,8506045-0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate83249·71·-0.3
Private job growth-9.332·2·-2.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,478———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01583638-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.5%17·55·-1.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.368·73·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200070.292·83·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.894·86·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200872.682·85·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127370·79·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.244·70·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202076.840·70·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.448·76·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.212·54·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.46%54·34·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit28%94·92·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains5.59%0·3·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.34%30·34·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.9%94·90·+1.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.9%3815+0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over19%28·44·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic15.8%69·76·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced19%100·100·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.75%12·7·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.2%76·85·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.2%48·37·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46%24·18·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.57%7·27·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic77.4%52·45·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.83%60·85·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher11.4%23-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.8%7837-0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.63114·15·-0.9
Stroke4%1710+0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication63.2%92·93·+1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,470———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken17,775———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.2%6125-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population11,459———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01095966+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed156———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.8%4636-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate16.7%14·57·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units911———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.6%4218+0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,462———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,067———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost15,413159+1.2County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.