placestats

Cumberland County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population10,378
Density11.6people per km² of land
Median household income$69,826
Land area896km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Cumberland County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Marshall County, IL, Minidoka County, ID, Ford County, KS, St. Louis County, MN, Clark County, IL, Bandera County, TX, Otter Tail County, MN, Morrison County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Cumberland Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$100,540100th pct98th pct +5.5 sd
Preventable hospital stays4,8200th pct4th pct +2.4 sd
Injury deaths58.6100th pct95th pct -2.0 sd
Effective property tax rate1.7694th pct by value95th pct by value +1.7 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.23%0th pct by value8th pct by value -1.6 sd
Economy score1.5596th pct by value84th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4454868-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.5%8089-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work117,620 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.3%7479-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability28%7678-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.624·7·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.7%5360+0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.0633451-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.9%3513+0.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain70.963·81·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents064·45·-0.4
Business closing rate1074·79·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments149———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.6740·38·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%211+0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents9.3748·55·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.8%7277-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.137%11·8·-1.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,333———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,333———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.6%8878+1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.5%3557+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.2%8278-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.3%2230-0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.878·66·+1.0
Coronary heart disease5.4%7873-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%4156-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.8%7467-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.4%5669+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.5720·19·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression24.5%4344+0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.2%8881-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.7384·80·+1.0
Economic connectedness0.8684463-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8233952-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.5596·84·+1.6
Education score-0.00343·42·-0.1
Effective property tax rate1.7694·95·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,758———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents13.832·35·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health16.9%7677-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.62221+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%3444-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.7%6777-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.6%3548+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.4%7874-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01598883-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12890·77·+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4246274-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,353,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.033922·50·-0.8
Hearing disability6.2%8678-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.9%5567-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.8%3555+0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%7775+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate83.5%90·94·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.9%5675-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units4,720———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate66337·23·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,20372·82·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.8%6970-0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain58.610095-2.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,50026·30·-0.3
Jail population rate21622·19·-0.9
Labour force5,965———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.1%8582-0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.5%2641+0.7CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.03842222-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.1 years6471+0.3County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.6%2141+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.4928·51·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years70.6%2626-0.9CDC PLACES
Material security score0.76368·80·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$71,9114260-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$61,03266·66·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,82924·40·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24.1 min5452-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.3 years44·58·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$7566·28·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$117,7000·19·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$69,826—67—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$71,7417472+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,06846·68·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.069%3444-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations10.73450-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.3%7177-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.9928·34·-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.3324·16·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.95110·12·-1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity21.6%9286-1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity38.5%3747+0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,180———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents010·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units3,489———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,360———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return258·55·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,623———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,2705063-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$100,54010098+5.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,032,700k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,272———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,261———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,330———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,994———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,241———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,108———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,013———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,133———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,213———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,116———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,345———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,347———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,450———
Poverty rate uncertain9.92%7477-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.2%4869-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3757277-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,975———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,416———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,321———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,295———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,567———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,832———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,769———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population85.7%72·82·+0.8
Preventable hospital stays4,82004+2.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate44743·32·-0.4
Private job growth3.1676·70·+0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,513———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01732647-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12%51·45·+0.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents29.614·11·-1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200061.368·59·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.370·62·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200860.668·56·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201268.174·66·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.388·80·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.194·80·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.488·79·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202420.188·85·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.23%0·8·-1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.3%24·22·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.4%48·67·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.69%66·82·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.4%76·51·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%8682-1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.3%40·57·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.87%10·11·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90%60·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%90·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.7%40·33·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.3%70·81·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.49%68·57·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic96%98·99·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.08%84·74·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.6%3033-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.3%4060+0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.061328·45·-0.8
Stroke2.8%8076-1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.2%18·21·-0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,880———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,795———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7%6279-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population10,378———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.028908-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed207———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.5%4446-0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate11.4%36·34·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units540———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%8083-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,058———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain146———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,890———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,3528281-0.8County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.