placestats

Chariton County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7406
Density3.8people per km² of land
Median household income$63,307
Land area1946km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chariton County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Pend Oreille County, WA, Runnels County, TX, Florence County, WI, Roberts County, SD, Pope County, IL, Boundary County, ID, Wasco County, OR, Thayer County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chariton Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median gross rent$5402nd pct by value3rd pct by value -2.1 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.5%2nd pct11th pct +1.9 sd
Share in the same house a year ago93.8%98th pct by value97th pct by value +1.7 sd
Friending bias-0.0272100th pct97th pct -1.7 sd
Cognitive disability19.5%8th pct16th pct +1.6 sd
Lacking social and emotional support20%100th pct95th pct -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4917084+0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.5%6161-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work71,670 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.556%204+0.5County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.5%211+1.9CDC PLACES
Any disability36.1%1825+1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.6212·7·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.3%826+1.4CDC PLACES
Binge drinking17.9%6544-0.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain48.517·30·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents3.0896·81·+0.9
Black-white residential segregation31.6—16·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate5.394·6·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments186———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.9314·7·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%819+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents23.488·86·+1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.2%8674-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.151%16·12·-0.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,166———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,166———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.9%4118-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.9%826+1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.5%816+1.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.7%5634+0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people43.284·91·+0.7
Coronary heart disease6.1%2538+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%3147+0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.9%1421+1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.2%6262+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.74·5·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Depression26%2228+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%3955-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.37431·31·-0.8
Economic connectedness0.9718080+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.677525-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.5818·36·-0.7
Education score-0.81215·9·-1.0
Effective property tax rate0.75729·44·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,248———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents23.762·60·+0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health20.6%3745+0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.33156-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%8653+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.4%5361-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.7%1228+1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.5%2535+0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.027210097-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14292·90·+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4226476-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$392,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.077755·46·+0.2
Hearing disability7.8%2517+0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.8%2949+0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%2749+0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.9%84·85·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.6%3553+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units3,797———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,53986·77·+0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,97442·48·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.7%2031+0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain78.48876-1.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,37467·74·+0.3
Jail population rate53665·65·+0.3
Labour force3,346———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.8%3848+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20%10095-1.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.04334118-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.6 years5054+0.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00078—6·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$3k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31.3%7184-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.848·74·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years74.4%7658+0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.57971·70·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$65,5693641-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,56540·32·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,59152·32·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24.5 min2448+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.2 years80·78·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5402·3·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$118,90036·20·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$63,307—50—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,0701629-1.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill90014·21·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0759%4455-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.54472-0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.5%3335+0.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99776·79·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.53966·43·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.082354·36·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.3%3331+0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity38.8%4943+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,655———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents024·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units2,148———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,630———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return246·56·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,073———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,5621627-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$55,9504256-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$414,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,403———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,399———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,971———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,676———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,172———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,851———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line850———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain740———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,161———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,115———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,948———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,002———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,408———
Poverty rate11.9%5963-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain10.4%9676-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4784651+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,154———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,340———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,214———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,821———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,969———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,077———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,089———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population47.8%38·28·-0.3
Preventable hospital stays2,4605162-0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,00289·81·+0.8
Private job growth-2.2510·10·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,345———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01792851-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.8%59·43·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents6170·77·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.210·41·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200456.112·34·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200856.528·45·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201264.236·56·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201676.950·69·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.354·71·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.452·71·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.292·89·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.74%16·15·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.2%50·43·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.9%82·85·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.32%64·64·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.6%92·54·+1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%3744+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25%78·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain2.63%61·40·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.2%26·24·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.8%98·97·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.5%38·24·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57%74·79·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.67%36·31·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.1%82·87·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.39%80·79·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.4%3637-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.8%2848+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.51560·81·+0.1
Stroke3.2%3342+0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.3%51·50·+0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,450———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,288———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.4%2442+0.5CDC PLACES
Total population7,406———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01574024-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed98———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%4272-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate30.1%86·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,142———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%4752-0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,298———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain63———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,921———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,9926462-0.4County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.